scispace - formally typeset
F

Friedrich Wilkening

Researcher at University of Zurich

Publications -  34
Citations -  2194

Friedrich Wilkening is an academic researcher from University of Zurich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Exponential growth & Nonparametric statistics. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 34 publications receiving 2074 citations. Previous affiliations of Friedrich Wilkening include University of Tübingen & University of Düsseldorf.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Affective and Deliberative Processes in Risky Choice: Age Differences in Risk Taking in the Columbia Card Task

TL;DR: Results are consistent with recent dual-system explanations of risk taking as the result of competition between affective processes and deliberative cognitive-control processes, with adolescents' affective system tending to override the deliberative system in states of heightened emotional arousal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated risk taking and underlying information use in 13- to 16- and 17- to 19-year-old adolescents and in adults in 4 experiments, using a novel dynamic risk-taking task, the Columbia Card Task (CCT).
Journal ArticleDOI

Motor processes in children's imagery: the case of mental rotation of hands.

TL;DR: It is strongly suggested that young children's kinetic imagery is guided by motor processes, even more so than adults'.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrating velocity, time, and distance information: a developmental study.

TL;DR: The knowledge level revealed for young children contrasts sharply with results from previous studies using Piagetian choice tasks, which apparently investigate selective attention to one dimension rather than conceptual understanding of relations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intuitive physics in action and judgment: the development of knowledge about projectile motion

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared intuitive knowledge about projectile motion expressed in action with knowledge expressed in explicit judgments, and found that children and adults correctly varied the launch speed with respect to both height of release and target distance in the action condition.