scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "G.A. van der Weijden published in 2000"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The adjunctive use of an oxidising agent peroxyborate to chlor hexidine, proved to be superior to chlorhexidine alone with regard to the inhibition of plaque and development of gingivitis.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that using an oxidising agent in addition to chlorhexidine reduces staining. AIM The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether, compared to chlorhexidine alone, the use of an oxidising mouthrinse as an adjunct to chlorhexidine is efficacious in reducing stain, plaque and gingivitis. METHOD This study had a single-blind, 2-group parallel design, including a 14-day experimental non-brushing period during which 1 group (n= 14) used chlorhexidine alone (CHX) (chlorhexidine mouthrinse, 0.12% Oral-B laboratories, Ireland), and the other (n= 14) used chlorhexidine in combination with an oxidising agent (sodiumperborate-monohydrate-Bocasan, Oral-B laboratories, Ireland). Patients were randomly assigned to either group. All participants received a scaling and polishing before the start of the trial. No oral hygiene instructions were given. Since, at the start of the experiment, all stain and plaque were removed, only the gingival condition was evaluated at baseline by means of bleeding on marginal probing. The examination after 14 days of rinsing included the evaluation of plaque, bleeding on marginal probing and stain (GMSI: gingival modification of the stain index). RESULTS The results showed at day 14, a significant difference between the 2 groups for plaque (CHX: 0.18, CHX+PER: 0.08, p=0.03) and gingival bleeding (CHX: 0.38, CHX+PER: 0.21, p<0.001). The proportion of stained surfaces was less in the CHX+PER group (28%), than in the chlorhexidine group (48%) (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the adjunctive use of an oxidising agent peroxyborate to chlorhexidine, proved to be superior to chlorhexidine alone with regard to the inhibition of plaque and development of gingivitis. In addition, the proportion of stained surfaces was significantly less when adding the oxidising mouthrinse to chlorhexidine.

86 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study identified 3 main risk markers for disease progression at the full mouth level: age, amount ofSubgingival calculus and subgingival presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans and motile micro-organisms and the plaque score.
Abstract: Background, aims: In order to investigate the role of various putative clinical and microbiological risk markers, a longitudinal study was initiated in a young population deprived of regular dental care. In 1987 all inhabitants in the age range 15-25 years living in a village with approximately 2000 inhabitants at a tea estate on Western Java, Indonesia, were examined clinically and microbiologically. In total, 167 subjects of the original group of 255 adolescents were re-examined in 1994. The material presented in this paper describes the clinical periodontal condition at baseline (1987) and at follow-up (1994), 7 years later. Furthermore, the relationship between progression of the disease and baseline clinical and microbiological data was assessed. Methods: Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), pocket depth (PD), and attachment loss (AL) were scored at the approximal surfaces of the vestibular aspects of all teeth. The number of approximal surfaces of the Ramfjord teeth showing subgingival calculus was recorded. At baseline, the dorsum of the tongue, the buccal gingiva in the upper jaw, the saliva and the deepest bleeding pocket without clinical loss of attachment were sampled for microbiological examination with phase contrast microscopy and indirect immunofluorescence. Results: Mean values at baseline and at follow-up were PI: 1.01 and 1.15, BOP: 0.80 and 1.16, PD 3.26 mm and 3.32 mm, AL: 0.33 mm and 0.73 mm, respectively. All parameters except PD showed a statistically significant increase over the 7-year period. The prevalence of the studied bacteria irrespective of the sample site was: A. actinomycetemcomitans 53%, P. gingivalis 88%, P. intermedia 100%, spirochetes 89% and motile micro-organisms 100%. At the full mouth level, logistic regression showed significant odds ratios for progressive disease with age (1.15), subgingival calculus (1.20) and subgingival presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans (4.61). Presence of any of the selected micro-organisms on the mucous membranes was not related with progressive disease. In order to study local factors to explain local disease activity, each subject was characterized using the sampled pocket, which was the deepest bleeding pocket without LA at baseline, as a single response site per patient. In this constrained design, the main statistical factors associated with progressive disease were presence of motile micro-organisms and the plaque score. Conclusions: This study identified 3 main risk markers for disease progression at the full mouth level: age, amount of subgingival calculus and subgingival presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans.

80 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Both the laboratory and clinical study show that the Braun Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover (D9) is more effective than the Philips/Jordan HP 735, and both study models indicate that this difference is greatest on the approximal vestibular surfaces.
Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of plaque removal by 2 different toothbrushes in a laboratory model and in a clinical study. METHOD The 2 brushes used were the Philips/Jordan HP 735 and the Braun Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover (D9). Both were compared in a laboratory study (using a robot system) and a short-term clinical study. For the laboratory study, plaque substitute was applied to the artificial teeth of ten typodonts, which were cleaned by a robot for 2 min. The remaining plaque substitute was measured on buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces, as well as gumline and interproximal sites, using a computerized vision system. The clinical study included 23 non-dental students. All subjects received a single oral prophylaxis and were asked not to brush their teeth for 48 h prior to their appointment. After the amount of plaque had been evaluated at 6 sites per tooth, subjects brushed in a random split-mouth order with the 2 electric toothbrushes, after which the amount of plaque was re-evaluated. RESULTS The results of the laboratory study showed that, for all surfaces combined, the mean removal of plaque substitute for both brushes was the same. However, at the vestibular and the approximal vestibular surfaces, the reduction in plaque substitute was significantly higher (p<0.01) with the Braun toothbrush compared to the Philips. In the clinical study, the mean overall plaque reduction for the Braun toothbrush (74%) was significantly higher than for the Philips (66%). Further analysis revealed that the significant difference in favour of the Braun brush was mainly due to plaque removal from the approximal vestibular and the approximal lingual sites. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, both the laboratory and clinical study show that the Braun Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover (D9) is more effective than the Philips/Jordan HP 735. Both study models indicate that this difference is greatest on the approximal vestibular surfaces.

18 citations





Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors find that a goede mondgezondheid alleen behouden kan blijven door zorgvuldige gebitsreiniging, vergt echter veel tijd en vaardigheid.
Abstract: Uit hoofdstuk 11 blijkt dat een goede mondgezondheid alleen behouden kan blijven door zorgvuldige gebitsreiniging. Zorgvuldige gebitsreiniging vergt echter veel tijd en vaardigheid. Het gebruik van een fluoridetandpasta is een vereiste. Door het poetsen met tandpasta wordt het gebit beter gereinigd dan wanneer alleen met water wordt gepoetst. Fluoride lijkt onontbeerlijk indien men met poetsen caries wil voorkomen. De mondhygiene van veel mensen laat echter te wensen over. Zijn er voor hen mogelijkheden om de mondhygiene te ondersteunen met bijvoorbeeld chemische middelen of zijn er alternatieven voor de mechanische plaqueverwijdering?