G
Gail S. Goodman
Researcher at University of California, Davis
Publications - 216
Citations - 12712
Gail S. Goodman is an academic researcher from University of California, Davis. The author has contributed to research in topics: Child abuse & Sexual abuse. The author has an hindex of 61, co-authored 210 publications receiving 12153 citations. Previous affiliations of Gail S. Goodman include University of California, Berkeley & University of Southern California.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Why children tell: a model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse
TL;DR: There was significant support for the model, suggesting that children who were older, came from incestuous families, felt greater responsibility for the abuse, and feared negative consequences of disclosure took longer to disclose.
Journal ArticleDOI
Testifying in criminal court: emotional effects on child sexual assault victims.
TL;DR: The two most pervasive predictors of children's experiences in the courtroom, however, were age and severity of abuse and few innovative techniques were used to help the children testify.
Journal ArticleDOI
Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse.
TL;DR: Significant age differences in free recall and doll demonstration, found only in the nongenital condition, implicated socioemotional factors as suppressing the reports of older children who experienced genital contact.
Journal ArticleDOI
Expectation and Anticipation of Dynamic Visual Events by 3.5-Month-Old Babies.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the development of visual expectancies in 3.5-month-old infants and find that infants can detect regularity in a spatio-temporal series, will develop expectancies for events in the series, and will act on the basis of those expectancies even when those actions have no effect on the stimulus events.
Journal ArticleDOI
Age differences in eyewitness testimony
Gail S. Goodman,Rebecca S. Reed +1 more
TL;DR: This paper examined age differences in eyewitness testimony and found that 3-year-olds answered fewer objective questions correctly, recalled little about what happened, and identified the confederate less frequently than adults.