A new heuristic approach for minimizing possibly nonlinear and non-differentiable continuous space functions is presented. By means of an extensive testbed it is demonstrated that the new method converges faster and with more certainty than many other acclaimed global optimization methods. The new method requires few control variables, is robust, easy to use, and lends itself very well to parallel computation.

/pdf/differential-evolution-a-simple-and-efficient-heuristic-for-4vrb5o5ldc.pdf

Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces

In this paper we present a new data structure for representing Boolean functions and an associated set of manipulation algorithms. Functions are represented by directed, acyclic graphs in a manner similar to the representations introduced by Lee [1] and Akers [2], but with further restrictions on the ordering of decision variables in the graph. Although a function requires, in the worst case, a graph of size exponential in the number of arguments, many of the functions encountered in typical applications have a more reasonable representation. Our algorithms have time complexity proportional to the sizes of the graphs being operated on, and hence are quite efficient as long as the graphs do not grow too large. We present experimental results from applying these algorithms to problems in logic design verification that demonstrate the practicality of our approach.

/pdf/graph-based-algorithms-for-boolean-function-manipulation-2u3osq5jc0.pdf

Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation

Our growing dependence on increasingly complex computer and software systems necessitates the development of formalisms, techniques, and tools for assessing functional properties of these systems. One such technique that has emerged in the last twenty years is model checking, which systematically (and automatically) checks whether a model of a given system satisfies a desired property such as deadlock freedom, invariants, and request-response properties. This automated technique for verification and debugging has developed into a mature and widely used approach with many applications. Principles of Model Checking offers a comprehensive introduction to model checking that is not only a text suitable for classroom use but also a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners in the field. The book begins with the basic principles for modeling concurrent and communicating systems, introduces different classes of properties (including safety and liveness), presents the notion of fairness, and provides automata-based algorithms for these properties. It introduces the temporal logics LTL and CTL, compares them, and covers algorithms for verifying these logics, discussing real-time systems as well as systems subject to random phenomena. Separate chapters treat such efficiency-improving techniques as abstraction and symbolic manipulation. The book includes an extensive set of examples (most of which run through several chapters) and a complete set of basic results accompanied by detailed proofs. Each chapter concludes with a summary, bibliographic notes, and an extensive list of exercises of both practical and theoretical nature.

/pdf/principles-of-model-checking-249iimickz.pdf

Principles of Model Checking

Model Checking

Dynamic Bayesian Networks: Representation, Inference and Learning by Kevin Patrick Murphy Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Stuart Russell, Chair Modelling sequential data is important in many areas of science and engineering. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and Kalman filter models (KFMs) are popular for this because they are simple and flexible. For example, HMMs have been used for speech recognition and bio-sequence analysis, and KFMs have been used for problems ranging from tracking planes and missiles to predicting the economy. However, HMMs and KFMs are limited in their “expressive power”. Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) generalize HMMs by allowing the state space to be represented in factored form, instead of as a single discrete random variable. DBNs generalize KFMs by allowing arbitrary probability distributions, not just (unimodal) linear-Gaussian. In this thesis, I will discuss how to represent many different kinds of models as DBNs, how to perform exact and approximate inference in DBNs, and how to learn DBN models from sequential data. In particular, the main novel technical contributions of this thesis are as follows: a way of representing Hierarchical HMMs as DBNs, which enables inference to be done in O(T ) time instead of O(T ), where T is the length of the sequence; an exact smoothing algorithm that takes O(log T ) space instead of O(T ); a simple way of using the junction tree algorithm for online inference in DBNs; new complexity bounds on exact online inference in DBNs; a new deterministic approximate inference algorithm called factored frontier; an analysis of the relationship between the BK algorithm and loopy belief propagation; a way of applying Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering to DBNs in general, and the SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) problem in particular; a way of extending the structural EM algorithm to DBNs; and a variety of different applications of DBNs. However, perhaps the main value of the thesis is its catholic presentation of the field of sequential data modelling.

/pdf/dynamic-bayesian-networks-representation-inference-and-yy4fhfxdcj.pdf

Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning

1. Introduction.- 1.1 Design Styles for VLSI Systems.- 1.2 Automatic Logic Synthesis.- 1.3 PLA Implementation.- 1.4 History of Logic Minimization.- 1.5 ESPRESSO-II.- 1.6 Organization of the Book.- 2. Basic Definitions.- 2.1 Operations on Logic Functions.- 2.2 Algebraic Representation of a Logic Function.- 2.3 Cubes and Covers.- 3. Decomposition and Unate Functions.- 3.1 Cofactors and the Shannon Expansion.- 3.2 Merging.- 3.3 Unate Functions.- 3.4 The Choice of the Splitting Variable.- 3.5 Unate Complementation.- 3.6 SIMPLIFY.- 4. The ESPRESSO Minimization Loop and Algorithms.- 4.0 Introduction.- 4.1 Complementation.- 4.2 Tautology.- 4.2.1 Vanilla Recursive Tautology.- 4.2.2 Efficiency Results for Tautology.- 4.2.3 Improving the Efficiency of Tautology.- 4.2.4 Tautology for Multiple-Output Functions.- 4.3 Expand.- 4.3.1 The Blocking Matrix.- 4.3.2 The Covering Matrix.- 4.3.3 Multiple-Output Functions.- 4.3.4 Reduction of the Blocking and Covering Matrices.- 4.3.5 The Raising Set and Maximal Feasible Covering Set.- 4.3.6 The Endgame.- 4.3.7 The Primality of c+.- 4.4 Essential Primes.- 4.5 Irredundant Cover.- 4.6 Reduction.- 4.6.1 The Unate Recursive Paradigm for Reduction.- 4.6.2 Establishing the Recursive Paradigm.- 4.6.3 The Unate Case.- 4.7 Lastgasp.- 4.8 Makesparse.- 4.9 Output Splitting.- 5. Multiple-Valued Minimization.- 6. Experimental Results.- 6.1 Analysis of Raw Data for ESPRESSO-IIAPL.- 6.2 Analysis of Algorithms.- 6.3 Optimality of ESPRESSO-II Results.- 7. Comparisons and Conclusions.- 7.1 Qualitative Evaluation of Algorithms of ESPRESSO-II.- 7.2 Comparison with ESPRESSO-IIC.- 7.3 Comparison of ESPRESSO-II with Other Programs.- 7.4 Other Applications of Logic Minimization.- 7.5 Directions for Future Research.- References.

Logic Minimization Algorithms for VLSI Synthesis

ion Manual abstraction can be performed by giving a file containing the names of variables to abstract. For each variable appearing in the file, a new primary input node is created to drive all the nodes that were previously driven by the variable. Abstracting a net effectively allows it to take any value in its range, at every clock cycle. Fair CTL model checking and language emptiness check VIS performs fair CTL model checking under Buchi fairness constraints. In addition, VIS can perform language emptiness checking by model checking the formula EG true. The language of a design is given by sequences over the set of reachable states that do not violate the fairness constraint. The language emptiness check can be used to perform language containment by expressing the set of bad behaviors as another component of the system. If model checking or language emptiness fail, VIS reports the failure with a counterexample, (i.e., behavior seen in the system that does not satisfy the property for model checking, or valid behavior seen in the system for language emptiness). This is called the “debug” trace. Debug traces list a set of states that are on a path to a fair cycle and fail the CTL formula. Equivalence checking VIS provides the capability to check the combinational equivalence of two designs. An important usage of combinational equivalence is to provide a sanity check when re-synthesizing portions of a network. VIS also provides the capability to test the sequential equivalence of two designs. Sequential verification is done by building the product finite state machine, and checking whether a state where the values of two corresponding outputs differ, can be reached from the set of initial states of the product machine. If this happens, a debug trace is provided. Both combinational and sequential verification are implemented using BDD-based routines. Simulation VIS also provides traditionaldesign verification in the form of a cycle-based simulator that uses BDD techniques. Since VIS performs both formal verification and simulation using the same data structures, consistency between them is ensured. VIS can generate random input patterns or accept user-specified input patterns. Any subtree of the specified hierarchy may be simulated.

/pdf/vis-a-system-for-verification-and-synthesis-3avqy7vpsc.pdf

VIS: A System for Verification and Synthesis

In this paper we present theory and experiments on the algebraic decision diagrams (ADDs). These diagrams extend BDD's by allowing values from an arbitrary finite domain to be associated with the terminal nodes. We present a treatment founded in Boolean algebras and discuss algorithms and results in applications like matrix multiplication and shortest path algorithms. Furthermore, we outline possible applications of ADD's to logic synthesis, formal verification, and testing of digital systems.

Algebraic decision diagrams and their applications

From the Publisher:
Logic Synthesis and Verification Algorithms blends mathematical foundations and algorithmic developments with circuit design issues. Each new technique is presented in the context of its application to design. Through the study of optimal two-level and multilevel combinational circuit design, the reader is introduced to basic concepts, such as Boolean algebra, local search, and algebraic factorization. Similarly, through the study of optimal sequential circuit design, the reader is introduced to graph algorithms, finite state systems, and language theory. Throughout the book, recurrent themes such as branch and bound, dynamic programming, and symbolic implicit enumeration are used to establish optimal design principles. Circuit designers and CAD tool developers alike will find Logic Synthesis and Verification Algorithms useful as an introductory and reference text. The rich collection of examples and solved problems make this book ideal for self study. Because of its careful balance of theory and application, Logic Synthesis and Verification Algorithms will serve well as a textbook for upper division and first year graduate students in electrical and computer engineering.

Logic Synthesis and Verification Algorithms

A survey of logic synthesis techniques for multilevel combinational logic is presented. The goal is to provide more in-depth background and perspective for people interested in pursuing or assessing some of the topics in this emerging field. Introductions, capsule summaries, and, in some cases, detailed analysis of the synthesis methods that have become established as practically significant are provided. Also included are some methods that have theoretical interest and potential for future impact. The discussion covers notation and definitions, representation of the network and nodes, logic decomposition/restructuring, logic optimization/minimization, logic synthesis and testing, and technology mapping. >

Gary D. Hachtel

Papers

Logic Minimization Algorithms for VLSI Synthesis

VIS: A System for Verification and Synthesis

Algebraic decision diagrams and their applications

Logic Synthesis and Verification Algorithms

Multilevel logic synthesis