scispace - formally typeset
G

Gillian A. O'Driscoll

Researcher at McGill University

Publications -  41
Citations -  2293

Gillian A. O'Driscoll is an academic researcher from McGill University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Smooth pursuit & Eye movement. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 39 publications receiving 2217 citations. Previous affiliations of Gillian A. O'Driscoll include Douglas Mental Health University Institute & Harvard University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional neuroanatomy of antisaccade eye movements investigated with positron emission tomography

TL;DR: The data suggest that it is the FEFs in prefrontal cortex that differentiate between conditions in which the required oculomotor response changes while the stimulus remains the same, rather than areas 46 and 9, which, in human studies, have been linked to the performance of complex cognitive tasks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nicotine and Behavioral Markers of Risk for Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study

TL;DR: In patients, the magnitude of improvement in attention on nicotine was correlated with the improvement on eye movement tasks, suggesting that nicotine improves performance on both attention and oculomotor markers of risk for schizophrenia, possibly via common mechanisms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Antisaccades and Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking and Schizotypy

TL;DR: Subjects with elevated Perceptual Aberration Scale scores have performance deficits on oculomotor tasks that have been linked to latent liability to schizophrenia, namely, smooth pursuit and antisaccade performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Executive functions and methylphenidate response in subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

TL;DR: This article used oculomotor tests to investigate executive functions and methylphenidate response in two subtypes of ADHD, ADHD-combined and ADHD-inattentive boys.
Journal ArticleDOI

Smooth pursuit in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review of research since 1993.

TL;DR: Meta-analytic procedures were used to quantify patient-control differences in eye-tracking and to evaluate potential moderators of effect size including patient and target characteristics and characteristics of the control population (matched or not).