scispace - formally typeset
G

Graham Thornicroft

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  695
Citations -  56137

Graham Thornicroft is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mental health & Mental illness. The author has an hindex of 109, co-authored 648 publications receiving 46180 citations. Previous affiliations of Graham Thornicroft include San Antonio River Authority & Public Health Foundation of India.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation.

TL;DR: The aim of this paper is to attempt to place developments in a conceptual context, to summarise the ethics-based and evidence-based reasons why it has to be considered as necessary, and to illustrate some of the emerging evidence which shows the advantages to be gained from it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

TL;DR: The General Comment on Article 12 of the CRPD threatens to undermine critical rights for persons with mental disabilities, including the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health, access to justice, theright to liberty, and the right to life.
Book

The Mental Health Matrix: A Manual to Improve Services

TL;DR: The matrix model as a pragmatic guide to improve services References Glossary Index.
Journal ArticleDOI

Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments.

TL;DR: An overview of the key issues facing those who are in a position to influence the planning and provision of mental health systems, and who need to address questions of which staff, services and sectors to invest in, and for which patients, is given.
Journal ArticleDOI

The economic impact of mental health stigma and discrimination: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Mental illness stigma/discrimination was found to impact negatively on employment, income, public views about resource allocation and healthcare costs, and interventions that reduce stigma may also be economically beneficial.