scispace - formally typeset
G

Gregory J. McRae

Researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Publications -  44
Citations -  2415

Gregory J. McRae is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Uncertainty analysis & Air quality index. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 44 publications receiving 2311 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models

TL;DR: In this article, a new method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models is presented, which approximates model response surfaces, which are functions of model input parameters, using orthogonal polynomials, whose weighting functions are the probabilistic density functions of the input uncertain parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Three-Stage Kinetic Model of Amyloid Fibrillation

TL;DR: A three-stage mechanism consisting of protein misfolding, nucleation, and fibril elongation is proposed and supported by the features of homogeneous fibrillation responses, and the wide applicability of the model confirms thatfibrillation kinetics may be fairly similar among amyloid proteins and for different environmental factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Photochemical modeling of the Southern California air quality study

TL;DR: In this article, the CIT photochemical airshed model is updated and then applied to the August 27-29,============1987, SCAQS intensive monitoring period using measured meteorological parameters, measured initial and boundary conditions, and the official emission inventory prepared by the government, ozone concentrations are underpredicted by 23% on average.

Application of the probabilistic collocation method for an uncertainty analysis of a simple ocean model

TL;DR: A comparison of the results of the collocation method with a traditional Monte Carlo simulation show that the collocations method gives a better approximation for the probability density function of the model’s response with less than 20 model runs as compared with a Monte Carlo Simulation of 5000 model runs.