1. Over the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in interest in the immune system and the role it plays in the regulation of disease susceptibility, giving rise to the field of eco-immunology. 2. Eco-immunology aims to understand changes in host immune responses in the broader framework of an organism's evolutionary, ecological and life-history contexts. 3. The immune system, however, is complex and multifaceted and can be intimidating for the nonimmunologist interested in incorporating immunological questions into their research. Which immune responses should one measure and what is the biological significance of these measures? 4. The focus of this review is to describe a wide range of eco-immunology techniques, from the simple to the sophisticated, with the goal of providing researchers with a range of options to consider incorporating in their own research programs. 5. These techniques were chosen because they provide relatively straightforward, biologically meaningful assessments of immune function, many of which can be performed across a range of ecological contexts (i.e. field vs. laboratory) and in a wide range of vertebrate animals without relying on species-specific reagents. 6. By incorporating assessments of immune function into their specific research questions, animal ecologists will gain a more comprehensive understanding of organism-environment interactions.

https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01813.x

Beyond phytohaemagglutinin: assessing vertebrate immune function across ecological contexts.

Effects of Mushroom and Herb Polysaccharides on Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses of Eimeria tenella-Infected Chickens

Age-related alterations to immune parameters in Labrador retriever dogs.

Background: Eosinophilic mucus chronic rhinosinusitis (EMCRS) can be subclassified using the criteria of detection of fungi in eosinophilic mucus and systemic fungal allergy. Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), a subgroup of EMCRS characterized by the presence of fungal allergy, is proposed to be an immunoglobulin (Ig)E-driven disease, distinct from other EMCRS subgroups. However, our recent studies cast doubt on the central pathogenic role of allergy in AFS. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical features of EMCRS patients from the different subcategories to determine the relevance of this classification system.

Method: The demographic, clinical, and immunologic characteristics of the EMCRS subgroups were examined prospectively and compared with three control groups: healthy volunteers, allergic rhinitis with fungal allergy, and chronic rhinosinusitis without eosinophilic mucus.

Results: EMCRS patients with allergy were younger than those without. There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic parameters between EMCRS subgroups. As a single group, EMCRS had a more severe sinus disease compared with chronic rhinosinusitis patients.

Conclusions: AFS was not clinically distinct from other subgroups of EMCRS. However, eosinophilic mucus may mark a more severe and distinct form of sinus disease.

H. Choremi-Papadopoulou

Papers

Standardisation and quality assurance of lymphocyte proliferation assays for use in the assessment of immune function