A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade

The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: A critical review

Leaching mechanisms of oxyanionic metalloid and metal species in alkaline solid wastes: A review

Antimony as a global dilemma: Geochemistry, mobility, fate and transport ☆

Environmental context. Antimony first attracted public attention in the mid-1990s amid claims that it was involved in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. A substantial number of papers have now been published on the element and its behaviour in the natural environment. However, many key aspects of the environmental chemistry of antimony remain poorly understood. These include critical areas such as its ecotoxicology, its global cycling through different environmental compartments, and what chemical form it takes in different environments. More focussed research would help the situation. The present review highlights several areas of environmental antimony chemistry that urgently need to be addressed. Abstract. The objective of the present article is to present a critical overview of issues related to the current state of knowledge on the behaviour of antimony in the environment. It makes no attempt to systematically review all published data. However, it does provide a list of the main published reviews on antimony and identifies subjects where systematic reviews are needed. Areas where our knowledge is strong – and the corresponding gaps – in subjects ranging from total concentrations and speciation in the various environmental compartments, to ecotoxicity, to cycling between compartments, are discussed, along with the underlying research. Determining total antimony no longer poses a problem for most environmental samples but speciation measurements remain challenging throughout the process, from sampling to analysis. This means that the analytical tools still need to be improved but experience shows that, to be useful in practice, this should be directly driven by the requirements of laboratory and field measurements. Many different issues can be identified where further research is required, both in the laboratory and in the field, the most urgently needed studies probably being: (i) long-term spatial and temporal studies in the different environmental compartments in order to collect the data needed to establish a global biogeochemical cycle; (ii) laboratory studies of antimony interactions with potential natural binders; (iii) reliable ecotoxicological studies.

/pdf/antimony-in-the-environment-knowns-and-unknowns-4jbx9vp47h.pdf

Antimony in the environment: knowns and unknowns

Antimony is an element of growing interest for a variety of industrial applications, even though Sb compounds are classified as priority pollutants by the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States. Iron (Fe) hydroxides appear to be important sorbents for Sb in soils and sediments, but mineral surfaces can also catalyze oxidation processes and may thus mobilize Sb. The aim of this study was to investigate whether goethite immobilizes Sb by sorption or whether Sb(III) adsorbed on goethite is oxidized and then released. The sorption of both Sb(III) and Sb(V) on goethite was studied in 0.01 and 0.1 M KClO4 M solutions as a function of pH and Sb concentration. To monitor oxidation processes Sb species were measured in solution and in the solid phase. The results show that both Sb(III) and Sb(V) form inner-sphere surface complexes at the goethite surface. Antimony(III) strongly adsorbs on goethite over a wide pH range (3-12), whereas maximum Sb(V) adsorption is found below pH 7. At higher ionic strength, the desorption of Sb(V) is shifted to lower pH values, most likely due to the formation of ion pairs KSb(OH)6 degrees. The sorption data of Sb(V) can be fitted by the modified triple-layer surface complexation model. Within 7 days, Sb(III) adsorbed on goethite is partly oxidized at pH 3, 5.9 and 9.7. The weak pH-dependence of the rate coefficients suggests that adsorbed Sb(III) is oxidized by 02 and that the coordination of Sb(III) to the surface increases the electron density of the Sb atom, which enhances the oxidation process. At pH values below pH 7, the oxidation of Sb(III) did not mobilize Sb within 35 days, while 30% of adsorbed Sb(III) was released into the solution at pH 9.9 within the same time. The adsorption of Sb(III) on Fe hydroxides over a wide pH range may be a major pathway for the oxidation and release of Sb(V).

Hermann Mönch

Papers

Sorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) to goethite: influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization.