scispace - formally typeset
H

Hilary S. Parker

Researcher at Johns Hopkins University

Publications -  10
Citations -  3603

Hilary S. Parker is an academic researcher from Johns Hopkins University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Bioconductor & Population. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 10 publications receiving 2325 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments

TL;DR: The sva package is described, which supports surrogate variable estimation with the sva function, direct adjustment for known batch effects with the ComBat function and adjustment for batch and latent variables in prediction problems with the fsva function.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction.

TL;DR: P permuted-SVA (pSVA) is introduced, a new statistical model that is blind to biological covariates to correct for technical artifacts while retaining biological heterogeneity in genomic data, which facilitated accurate subtype identification in head and neck cancer from gene expression data in both formalin-fixed and frozen samples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Removing batch effects for prediction problems with frozen surrogate variable analysis.

TL;DR: An new method called frozen surrogate variable analysis (fSVA) that borrows strength from a training set for individual sample batch correction and improves prediction accuracy in simulations and in public genomic studies is proposed.
Posted Content

Removing batch effects for prediction problems with frozen surrogate variable analysis

TL;DR: Frozen surrogate variable analysis (fSVA) as discussed by the authors is a batch correction method that borrows strength from a training set for individual sample batch correction, which improves prediction performance in simulations and in public genomic studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

The practical effect of batch on genomic prediction

TL;DR: It is shown that the impact of batch effects on prediction depends on the correlation between outcome and batch in the training data, and removing expression measurements most affected by batch before building predictors may improve the accuracy of those predictors.