scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Horst Mittelstaedt published in 1992"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: That the afference of the truncal system appears to enter the cord at the last two thoracic segments supports earlier conjectures about a supererogatory static function of the kidneys.
Abstract: In order to assess the effect of extravestibular gravity receptors on perception and control of body position against that of the otoliths, the subject (S) is exposed to gravitoinertial forces along the spinal (Z) axis on a tiltable board and on a sled centrifuge. It turns out that (1) both effects, on average, are equally strong, although with considerable variance between Ss; (2) the centroid of the mass(es) governing the somatic receptors lies near the centroid of the body; and (3) somatic gravity reception contains two distinctly different systems. Both appear unimpaired in paraplegic Ss with total bilateral sensory loss (TSL) from the 5th to the 1st lumbar spinal segment. One, the truncal system, is eliminated with TSL from the 11th thoracic segment upwards. Yet another is still functioning with TSL up to and including the 6th cervical segment, with the same effectiveness throughout this range. Hence it must be mediated by vagal or, less likely, sympathetic afference, that is, probably, by the influence of gravity on the cardiovascular system. That the afference of the truncal system appears to enter the cord at the last two thoracic segments supports earlier conjectures about a supererogatory static function of the kidneys. In fact, on the tiltable board, 7 bilaterally nephrectomized Ss behaved like paraplegics with TSL between T11 and C6, yet differed significantly in the predicted direction from the normal controls.

215 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It turns out that a good fit to the baseline results and a satisfactory prediction of the perceived orientation in microgravity can be obtained if the otolithic output is assumed to be normalized, but that of the somatic gravity sensors is not.

39 citations