I
I. D. Brown
Researcher at Medical Research Council
Publications - 26
Citations - 1425
I. D. Brown is an academic researcher from Medical Research Council. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Task (project management). The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 25 publications receiving 1390 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk perception and decision taking during the transition between novice and experienced driver status
I. D. Brown,John A. Groeger +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider evidence that young drivers underestimate certain traffic hazards and overestimate their own driving abilities and discuss the potential contribution of these misperceptions to their faulty decision taking during skills acquisition.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing one's own and others' driving ability: influences of sex, age, and experience.
John A. Groeger,I. D. Brown +1 more
TL;DR: The present studies suggest that the widely reported tendency for people to overestimate their ability may be largely artifactual, that males and females describe their performance similarly, and that previously reported age differences disappear when driving experience is controlled.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring the spare ‘mental capacity ’of car drivers by a subsidiary task
I. D. Brown,E. C. Poulton +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that relatively small changes in a driver's spare mental capacity can be detected by scoring his performance on a subsidiary task, which has no adverse effect upon driving.
Journal ArticleDOI
Components of driving skill: experience does not mean expertise
TL;DR: In this article, the authors assessed the driving skills of trained experts, of normal, experienced drivers, and of novices using an instrumented car driven in normal traffic, and found that normals largely resembled experts, while nonoices performed more poorly.
Journal ArticleDOI
Exposure and experience are a confounded nuisance in research on driver behaviour.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the control of self-induced risk exposure in accident data, instead of using this factor merely being used to explain individual differences in liability to error.