Preface.- Contributors.- List of Abbreviations.- Section 1: Basic Principles: Introduction.-Sources of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils.- Chemistry of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils.- Methods for the Determination of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils.- Effects of Heavy Metals and Metalloids on Soil Organisms.- Soil-Plant Relationships of Heavy Metals and Metalloids.- Heavy Metals and Metalloids as Micronutrients for Plants and Animals.-Critical Loads of Heavy Metals for Soils.- Section 2: Key Heavy Metals And Metalloids: Arsenic.- Cadmium.- Chromium and Nickel.- Cobalt and Manganese.- Copper.-Lead.- Mercury.- Selenium.- Zinc.- Section 3: Other Heavy Metals And Metalloids Of Potential Environmental Significance: Antimony.- Barium.- Gold.- Molybdenum.- Silver.- Thallium.- Tin.- Tungsten.- Uranium.- Vanadium.- Glossary of Specialized Terms.- Index.

Heavy metals in soils : trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability

Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: A review.

The two forms of inorganic arsenic, arsenate (AsV) and arsenite (AsIII), are easily taken up by the cells of the plant root Once in the cell, AsV can be readily converted to AsIII, the more toxic of the two forms AsV and AsIII both disrupt plant metabolism, but through distinct mechanisms AsV is a chemical analog of phosphate that can disrupt at least some phosphate-dependent aspects of metabolism AsV can be translocated across cellular membranes by phosphate transport proteins, leading to imbalances in phosphate supply It can compete with phosphate during phosphorylation reactions, leading to the formation of AsV adducts that are often unstable and short-lived As an example, the formation and rapid autohydrolysis of AsV-ADP sets in place a futile cycle that uncouples photophosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation, decreasing the ability of cells to produce ATP and carry out normal metabolism AsIII is a dithiol reactive compound that binds to and potentially inactivates enzymes containing closely spaced cysteine residues or dithiol co-factors Arsenic exposure generally induces the production of reactive oxygen species that can lead to the production of antioxidant metabolites and numerous enzymes involved in antioxidant defense Oxidative carbon metabolism, amino acid and protein relationships, and nitrogen and sulfur assimilation pathways are also impacted by As exposure Readjustment of several metabolic pathways, such as glutathione production, has been shown to lead to increased arsenic tolerance in plants Species- and cultivar-dependent variation in arsenic sensitivity and the remodeling of metabolite pools that occurs in response to As exposure gives hope that additional metabolic pathways associated with As tolerance will be identified

https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/16916/1/01_Finnegan_Arsenic_Toxicity%3a_The_Effects_2012.pdf

Arsenic toxicity: The effects on plant metabolism

Environmental contamination with arsenic (As) is a global environmental, agricultural and health issue due to the highly toxic and carcinogenic nature of As. Exposure of plants to As, even at very low concentration, can cause many morphological, physiological, and biochemical changes. The recent research on As in the soil-plant system indicates that As toxicity to plants varies with its speciation in plants (e.g., arsenite, As(III); arsenate, As(V)), with the type of plant species, and with other soil factors controlling As accumulation in plants. Various plant species have different mechanisms of As(III) or As(V) uptake, toxicity, and detoxification. This review briefly describes the sources and global extent of As contamination and As speciation in soil. We discuss different mechanisms responsible for As(III) and As(V) uptake, toxicity, and detoxification in plants, at physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels. This review highlights the importance of the As-induced generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as their damaging impacts on plants at biochemical, genetic, and molecular levels. The role of different enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase, and ascorbate peroxidase) and non-enzymatic (salicylic acid, proline, phytochelatins, glutathione, nitric oxide, and phosphorous) substances under As(III/V) stress have been delineated via conceptual models showing As translocation and toxicity pathways in plant species. Significantly, this review addresses the current, albeit partially understood, emerging aspects on (i) As-induced physiological, biochemical, and genotoxic mechanisms and responses in plants and (ii) the roles of different molecules in modulation of As-induced toxicities in plants. We also provide insight on some important research gaps that need to be filled to advance our scientific understanding in this area of research on As in soil-plant systems.

Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and speciation in plants : physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects

Chromium (Cr) is the second most common metal contaminant in ground water, soil, and sediments due to its wide industrial application, hence posing a serious environmental concern. Among various valence states, Cr(III) and Cr(VI) are the most stable forms. Cr(VI) is the most persistent in the soil and is highly toxic for biota. Since Cr is a non-essential element for plants, there is no uptake mechanism; Cr is taken up along essential elements such as sulfate through sulfate transporters. Cr accumulation in plants causes high toxicity in terms of reduction in growth and biomass accumulation, and Cr induces structural alterations. Cr interferes with photosynthetic and respiration processes, and water and minerals uptake mechanism. Various enzymatic activities related to starch and nitrogen metabolism are decreased by Cr toxicity either by direct interference with the enzymes or through the production of reactive oxygen species. Cr causes oxidative damage by destruction of membrane lipids and DNA damage. Cr may even cause the death of plant species. Few plant species are able to accumulate high amount of Cr without being damaged. Such Cr-tolerant, hyperaccumulator plants are exploited for their bioremediation property. The present review discusses Cr availability in the environment, Cr transfer to biota, toxicity issues, effect on germination and plant growth, morphological and ultrastructural aberrations, biochemical and physiological alterations, effect on metabolic processes, Cr-induced alterations at the molecular level, Cr hyperaccumulation and Cr detoxification mechanism, and the role of arbuscular mycorrhizae in Cr toxicity, in plants.

Chromium toxicity and tolerance in plants

Modulation of antioxidant defence system for arsenic detoxification in Indian mustard

Growth performance, chromium (Cr) accumulation potential and induction of antioxidative defence system and phytochelatins (PCs) were studied in hydroponically grown Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) and Vigna radiata (mungbean) at various levels of Cr treatments (0, 50, 100, 200 μM Cr). B. juncea accumulated twofolds and threefolds higher Cr in root and shoot, respectively than in V. radiata. Compared to B. juncea, V. radiata was found to be particularly sensitive to Cr as observed by the severity and development of Cr toxicity symptoms and decreased growth. Induction of PC and enzymes of antioxidant defence system were monitored as plant’s primary and secondary metal detoxifying responses, respectively. There was induction of PC and enzymes of antioxidant defence system in both the plants. PCs were induced significantly in roots and shoot of both the plants at all the levels of Cr treatments. Significantly higher activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) were observed in shoot of B. juncea than V. radiata at all the levels of Cr treatments. Induction of PCs along with antioxidant defence system in response to Cr stress suggests the cumulative role of PCs and antioxidants in conferring tolerance against accumulated Cr in B. juncea, and thereby signifies the suitability of this plant as one of the potential remediators of Cr.

Induction of phytochelatins and antioxidant defence system in Brassica juncea and Vigna radiata in response to chromium treatments

Background: Nitrogen [N] is a critical limiting nutrient for plants and has to be exogenously supplied to many crops, to achieve high yield with significant economic and environmental costs, specifically for rice. Development of low-input nitrogen sustainable crop is necessary for sustainable agriculture. Identification of regulatory elements associated with lowN tolerance is imperative for formulating innovative approaches for developing low-N tolerant crop plants, using gene manipulation. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are known to play crucial roles in the modulation of gene expression in plants under various environmental conditions. Methodology/Principal Findings: MiRNAs associated with low-N tolerance have not been identified so far. In this study, we investigated microarray-based miRNA expression in low-N tolerant and low-N sensitive rice genotypes under low N condition. Expressions of 32 miRNAs differed significantly in the two genotypes. Of these 32 miRNAs, expressions of nine miRNAs were further validated experimentally in leaves as well as in roots. Of these differentially expressed miRNAs, six miRNAs (miR156, miR164, miR528, miR820, miR821 and miR1318) were reported in leaves and four (miR164, miR167, miR168 and miR528) in roots. Target genes of all the 32 miRNAs were predicted, which encode transcription factors, and proteins associated with metabolic processes or stress responses. Expression levels of some of the corresponding miRNA targets were analysed and found to be significantly higher in low N-tolerant genotype than low-N sensitive genotype. These findings suggested that miRNAs played an important role in low-N tolerance in rice. Conclusions/Significance: Genome-wide differences in expression of miRNA in low N-tolerant and low N-sensitive rice genotypes were reported. This provides a platform for selection as well as manipulation of genotypes for better N utilization efficiency.

Identification and Comparative Analysis of MicroRNAs Associated with Low-N Tolerance in Rice Genotypes

Sulphur is known to interact with almost all essential macronutrients, secondary nutrients and micronutrients. These interactions can either enhance or reduce growth and yield of crops by influencing the nutrient uptake and utilization. Better understanding of these relationships can lead to more efficient crop production, higher yields, improved crop quality and harvestibility. Future improvements in crop varieties, water utilization, and general improvements of cultural techniques will require a better understanding of nutrient interaction. This chapter focuses the interaction of sulphur with other nutrients.

Sulphur Interaction with Other Nutrients

There is usually a positive yield response when sulfur (S) is applied to rapeseed (Brassica rapa L) plants grown on S-deficient soils Recommendations include application of some of or the entire amount of S at planting, but the plant requirement as well as availability of S to rapeseed during its various phenological stages is not well documented In a field trial, 40 kg S ha−1 was applied as gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) at planting (T1), during vegetative (T2, 30 days after sowing), flowering (T3, 50 days after sowing), and pod-filling (T4, 65 days after sowing) stages, and in split doses (T5) Biomass accumulation, leaf-area index, and leaf photosynthetic rate were studied at various growth stages Seed S (sulfate and organic S) and yield parameters were studied at harvest Sulfur (40 kg S ha− 1) applied in three split doses during different growth stages caused maximum increase in these parameters, followed by T2 and T1 However, no significant discernable difference was observed for the application 

Ishrat Khan

Papers

Modulation of antioxidant defence system for arsenic detoxification in Indian mustard

Induction of phytochelatins and antioxidant defence system in Brassica juncea and Vigna radiata in response to chromium treatments

Identification and Comparative Analysis of MicroRNAs Associated with Low-N Tolerance in Rice Genotypes

Sulphur Interaction with Other Nutrients

Effect of Timing of Sulfur Fertilizer Application on Growth and Yield of Rapeseed