A major assumption in many machine learning and data mining algorithms is that the training and future data must be in the same feature space and have the same distribution. However, in many real-world applications, this assumption may not hold. For example, we sometimes have a classification task in one domain of interest, but we only have sufficient training data in another domain of interest, where the latter data may be in a different feature space or follow a different data distribution. In such cases, knowledge transfer, if done successfully, would greatly improve the performance of learning by avoiding much expensive data-labeling efforts. In recent years, transfer learning has emerged as a new learning framework to address this problem. This survey focuses on categorizing and reviewing the current progress on transfer learning for classification, regression, and clustering problems. In this survey, we discuss the relationship between transfer learning and other related machine learning techniques such as domain adaptation, multitask learning and sample selection bias, as well as covariate shift. We also explore some potential future issues in transfer learning research.

/pdf/a-survey-on-transfer-learning-1hjmu3otql.pdf

A Survey on Transfer Learning

Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

Machine learning

Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning

We will review some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems. We will cover algorithmic and structural questions. We will touch on newer models, including those related to the WWW.

Random graphs

This paper presents the top 10 data mining algorithms identified by the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) in December 2006: C4.5, k-Means, SVM, Apriori, EM, PageRank, AdaBoost, kNN, Naive Bayes, and CART. These top 10 algorithms are among the most influential data mining algorithms in the research community. With each algorithm, we provide a description of the algorithm, discuss the impact of the algorithm, and review current and further research on the algorithm. These 10 algorithms cover classification, clustering, statistical learning, association analysis, and link mining, which are all among the most important topics in data mining research and development.

/pdf/top-10-algorithms-in-data-mining-70qtv03lc6.pdf

Top 10 algorithms in data mining

In this paper, we revisit the Image-to-Image (I2I) translation problem with transition consistency, namely the consistency defined on the conditional data mapping between each data pairs. Explicitly parameterizing each data mappings with a transition variable $t$, i.e., $x \overset{t(x,y)}{\mapsto}y$, we discover that existing I2I translation models mainly focus on maintaining consistency on results, e.g., image reconstruction or attribute prediction, named result consistency in our paper. This restricts their generalization ability to generate satisfactory results with unseen transitions in the test phase. Consequently, we propose to enforce both result consistency and transition consistency for I2I translation, to benefit the problem with a closer consistency between the input and output. To benefit the generalization ability of the translation model, we propose transition encoding to facilitate explicit regularization of these two {kinds} of consistencies on unseen transitions. We further generalize such explicitly regularized consistencies to distribution-level, thus facilitating a generalized overall consistency for I2I translation problems. With the above design, our proposed model, named Transition Encoding GAN (TEGAN), can poss superb generalization ability to generate realistic and semantically consistent translation results with unseen transitions in the test phase. It also provides a unified understanding of the existing GAN-based I2I transition models with our explicitly modeling of the data mapping, i.e., transition. Experiments on four different I2I translation tasks demonstrate the efficacy and generality of TEGAN.

Generative Transition Mechanism to Image-to-Image Translation via Encoded Transformation.

Active Learning (AL) requires learners to retrain the classifier with the minimum human supervisions or labeling in the unlabeled data pool when the current training set is not enough. However, general AL sampling strategies with a few label support inevitably suffer from performance decrease. To identify which samples determine the performance of the classification hyperplane, Core Vector Machine (CVM) and Ball Vector Machine (BVM) use the geometry boundary points of each Minimum Enclosing Ball (MEB) to train the classification hypothesis. Their theoretical analysis and experimental results show that the improved classifiers not only converge faster but also obtain higher accuracies compared with Support Vector Machine (SVM). Inspired by this, we formulate the cluster boundary point detection issue as the MEB boundary problem after presenting a convincing proof of this observation. Because the enclosing ball boundary may have a high fitting ratio when it can not enclose the class tightly, we split the global ball problem into two kinds of small Local Minimum Enclosing Ball (LMEB): Boundary ball (B-ball) and Core ball (C-ball) to tackle its over-fitting problem. Through calculating the update of radius and center when extending the local ball space, we adopt the minimum update ball to obtain the geometric update optimization scheme of B-ball and C-ball. After proving their update relationship, we design the LEB (Local Enclosing Ball) algorithm using centers of B-ball of each class to detect the enclosing ball boundary points for AL sampling. Experimental and theoretical studies have shown that the classification accuracy, time, and space performance of our proposed method significantly are superior than the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Geometric Active Learning via Enclosing Ball Boundary

Active learning (AL) improves the generalization performance for the current classification hypothesis by querying labels from a pool of unlabeled data. The sampling process is typically assessed by an informative, representative, or diverse evaluation policy. However, the policy, which needs an initial labeled set to start, may degenerate its performance in a cold-start hypothesis. In this article, we first show that typical AL sampling can be equivalently formulated as geometric sampling over minimum enclosing balls1 (MEBs) of clusters. Following the ɣ-tube structure in geometric clustering, we then divide one MEB covering a cluster into two parts: 1) a ɣ-tube and 2) a ɣ-ball. By estimating the error disagreement between sampling in MEB and ɣ-ball, our theoretical insight reveals that ɣ-tube can effectively measure the disagreement of hypotheses in original space over MEB and sampling space over ɣ-ball. To tighten our insight, we present generalization analysis, and the results show that sampling in ɣ-tube can derive higher probability bound to achieve a nearly zero generalization error. With these analyses, we finally apply the informative sampling policy of AL over ɣ-tube to present a tube AL (TAL) algorithm against the cold-start sampling issue. As a result, the dependency between the querying process and the evaluation policy of active sampling can be alleviated. Experimental results show that by using the ɣ-tube structure to deal with cold-start sampling, TAL achieves the superior performance than standard AL evaluation baselines by presenting substantial accuracy improvements. Image edge recognition extends our theoretical results.

Cold-Start Active Sampling via ɣ-Tube.

Multi-view Subspace Clustering on Topological Manifold

Fully-supervised shadow removal methods achieve the best restoration qualities on public datasets but still generate some shadow remnants. One of the reasons is the lack of large-scale shadow&shadow-free image pairs. Unsupervised methods can alleviate the issue but their restoration qualities are much lower than those of fully-supervised methods. In this work, we find that pretraining shadow removal networks on the image inpainting dataset can reduce the shadow remnants significantly: a naive encoder-decoder network gets competitive restoration quality w.r.t. the state-of-the-art methods via only 10% shadow&shadow-free image pairs. After analyzing networks with/without inpainting pre-training via the information stored in the weight (IIW), we find that inpainting pretraining improves restoration quality in non-shadow regions and enhances the generalization ability of networks significantly. Additionally, shadow removal fine-tuning enables networks to fill in the details of shadow regions. Inspired by these observations we formulate shadow removal as an adaptive fusion task that takes advantage of both shadow removal and image inpainting. Specifically, we develop an adaptive fusion network consisting of two encoders, an adaptive fusion block, and a decoder. The two encoders are responsible for extracting the feature from the shadow image and the shadow-masked image respectively. The adaptive fusion block is responsible for combining these features in an adaptive manner. Finally, the decoder converts the adaptive fused features to the desired shadow-free result. The extensive experiments show that our method empowered with inpainting outperforms all state-of-the-art methods.

Ivor W. Tsang

Papers

Generative Transition Mechanism to Image-to-Image Translation via Encoded Transformation.

Geometric Active Learning via Enclosing Ball Boundary

Cold-Start Active Sampling via ɣ-Tube.

Multi-view Subspace Clustering on Topological Manifold

Leveraging Inpainting for Single-Image Shadow Removal