scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Iwo Bialynicki-Birula published in 2007"


Proceedings ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, quantum mechanical uncertainty relations for the position and the momentum and for the angle and the angular momentum are expressed in the form of inequalities involving the Renyi entropies.
Abstract: Quantum mechanical uncertainty relations for the position and the momentum and for the angle and the angular momentum are expressed in the form of inequalities involving the Renyi entropies. These uncertainty relations hold not only for pure but also for mixed states. Analogous uncertainty relations are valid also for a pair of complementary observables (the analogs of x and p) in N‐level systems. All these uncertainty relations become more attractive when expressed in terms of the symmetrized Renyi entropies. The mathematical proofs of all the inequalities discussed in this paper can be found in Phys. Rev. A 74, No. 5 (2006); arXiv:quant‐ph/0608116.

49 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the relativistic trapped electron model of a spin one-half system with magnetic moment was used to model the transition between two discrete energy states of a two-level system.
Abstract: A systematic description of a spin one-half system endowed with magnetic moment or any other two-level system qubit interacting with the quantized electromagnetic field is developed. This description exploits a close analogy between a two-level system and the Dirac electron that comes to light when the two-level system is described within the formalism of second quantization in terms of fermionic creation and annihilation operators. The analogy enables one to introduce all the powerful tools of relativistic QED albeit in a greatly simplified form. The Feynman diagrams and the propagators turn out to be very useful. In particular, the QED concept of the vacuum polarization finds its close counterpart in the photon scattering off a two level system leading via the linear response theory to the general formulas for the atomic polarizability and the dynamic single spin susceptibility. To illustrate the usefulness of these methods, we calculate the polarizability and susceptibility up to the fourth order of perturbation theory. These ab initio calculations resolve some ambiguities concerning the sign prescription and the optical damping that arise in the phenomenological treatment. We also show that the methods used to study two-level systems qubits can be extended to many-level systems qudits. As an example, we describe the interaction with the quantized electromagnetic field of an atom with four relevant states: one S state and three degenerate P states. I. INTRODUCTION Two-level quantum systems, called qubits by Schumacher 1, play a fundamental role in quantum information theory. In this context they are usually treated as mathematical objects living in a two-dimensional Hilbert space. In reality, qubits always exist as material objects and we should not forget that they are endowed with concrete physical properties. In this paper we shall deal with two-level systems that interact directly with the electromagnetic field, such as spin one-half particles endowed with magnetic moment or twolevel atoms. Thus our results do not apply to qubits encoded in the polarization states of photons. We shall restrict ourselves in this paper to isolated qubits interacting only with the quantized electromagnetic field. Therefore the calculated decay rates will include only the spontaneous emission. A two-level system is the simplest model of a quantum system and yet in the presence of a coupling to the quantized electromagnetic field an exact solution has not been obtained. Even in the simplest case, when the electromagnetic field is restricted to just one mode, the model has been exactly solved only in the rotating-wave approximation by Jaynes and Cummings 2. Among the approximate solutions, perturbation theory is still the most universal and effective tool, especially in the world of electromagnetic phenomena. In the present paper we develop a systematic and complete theory based on an observation that a two-level system can be treated as a relativistic trapped electron. The translational degrees of freedom of such an electron are practically frozen. The only “degree of freedom” that remains is the electron’s ability to undergo transitions between two discrete energy states. In order to fully unfold the connection between the QED and the theory of two-level systems, we shall perform the second quantization of the standard theory of qubits. The description of two-level systems in terms of creation and annihilation operators has been introduced before cf., for example, 3 but no one has exploited the full potential of this formulation. The crucial element in our formulation is the systematic use of Feynman diagrams. To expose a close analogy with the relativistic theory, including the form of the propagators, we shall choose the energy scale in such a way that the energy levels of the two-level system have opposite signs. In this way, we arrive at a picture of a two-level system that coincides with the Dirac-sea view of quantum electrodynamics. The ground state of the two-level system corresponds to the occupation of the negative energy state, while the excited state corresponds to the occupation of the positive energy state accompanied by a hole in the negative energy sea. The transition between these two states due to the interaction with a photon can be represented by the two elementary Feynman diagrams shown in Fig. 1.

18 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the relativistic trapped electron model of a spin one-half system with magnetic moment was used to model the transition between two discrete energy states of a two-level system.
Abstract: A systematic description of a spin one-half system endowed with magnetic moment or any other two-level system qubit interacting with the quantized electromagnetic field is developed. This description exploits a close analogy between a two-level system and the Dirac electron that comes to light when the two-level system is described within the formalism of second quantization in terms of fermionic creation and annihilation operators. The analogy enables one to introduce all the powerful tools of relativistic QED albeit in a greatly simplified form. The Feynman diagrams and the propagators turn out to be very useful. In particular, the QED concept of the vacuum polarization finds its close counterpart in the photon scattering off a two level system leading via the linear response theory to the general formulas for the atomic polarizability and the dynamic single spin susceptibility. To illustrate the usefulness of these methods, we calculate the polarizability and susceptibility up to the fourth order of perturbation theory. These ab initio calculations resolve some ambiguities concerning the sign prescription and the optical damping that arise in the phenomenological treatment. We also show that the methods used to study two-level systems qubits can be extended to many-level systems qudits. As an example, we describe the interaction with the quantized electromagnetic field of an atom with four relevant states: one S state and three degenerate P states. I. INTRODUCTION Two-level quantum systems, called qubits by Schumacher 1, play a fundamental role in quantum information theory. In this context they are usually treated as mathematical objects living in a two-dimensional Hilbert space. In reality, qubits always exist as material objects and we should not forget that they are endowed with concrete physical properties. In this paper we shall deal with two-level systems that interact directly with the electromagnetic field, such as spin one-half particles endowed with magnetic moment or twolevel atoms. Thus our results do not apply to qubits encoded in the polarization states of photons. We shall restrict ourselves in this paper to isolated qubits interacting only with the quantized electromagnetic field. Therefore the calculated decay rates will include only the spontaneous emission. A two-level system is the simplest model of a quantum system and yet in the presence of a coupling to the quantized electromagnetic field an exact solution has not been obtained. Even in the simplest case, when the electromagnetic field is restricted to just one mode, the model has been exactly solved only in the rotating-wave approximation by Jaynes and Cummings 2. Among the approximate solutions, perturbation theory is still the most universal and effective tool, especially in the world of electromagnetic phenomena. In the present paper we develop a systematic and complete theory based on an observation that a two-level system can be treated as a relativistic trapped electron. The translational degrees of freedom of such an electron are practically frozen. The only “degree of freedom” that remains is the electron’s ability to undergo transitions between two discrete energy states. In order to fully unfold the connection between the QED and the theory of two-level systems, we shall perform the second quantization of the standard theory of qubits. The description of two-level systems in terms of creation and annihilation operators has been introduced before cf., for example, 3 but no one has exploited the full potential of this formulation. The crucial element in our formulation is the systematic use of Feynman diagrams. To expose a close analogy with the relativistic theory, including the form of the propagators, we shall choose the energy scale in such a way that the energy levels of the two-level system have opposite signs. In this way, we arrive at a picture of a two-level system that coincides with the Dirac-sea view of quantum electrodynamics. The ground state of the two-level system corresponds to the occupation of the negative energy state, while the excited state corresponds to the occupation of the positive energy state accompanied by a hole in the negative energy sea. The transition between these two states due to the interaction with a photon can be represented by the two elementary Feynman diagrams shown in Fig. 1.

1 citations