So far in this course we have dealt entirely with the evolution of characters that are controlled by simple Mendelian inheritance at a single locus. There are notes on the course website about gametic disequilibrium and how allele frequencies change at two loci simultaneously, but we didn’t discuss them. In every example we’ve considered we’ve imagined that we could understand something about evolution by examining the evolution of a single gene. That’s the domain of classical population genetics. For the next few weeks we’re going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach we’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery. If you know a little about the history of evolutionary biology, you may know that after the rediscovery of Mendel’s work in 1900 there was a heated debate between the “biometricians” (e.g., Galton and Pearson) and the “Mendelians” (e.g., de Vries, Correns, Bateson, and Morgan). Biometricians asserted that the really important variation in evolution didn’t follow Mendelian rules. Height, weight, skin color, and similar traits seemed to

Human biochemical genetics

(1991). Applied Linear Regression Models. Journal of Quality Technology: Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 76-77.

Applied Linear Regression Models

A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep

Some biochemical aspects pertaining to beef eating quality and consumer health: A review

Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality

Genetic parameter estimates in sabi sheep

Direct and maternal (co) variance components and heritability estimates for body weight at different ages and fleece traits in Afrino sheep

Genetic parameter estimates for pre-weaning weight traits in Dorper sheep.

Characterisation of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality traits

Genetic and environmental parameters were estimated for pre- and post-weaning average daily gain (ADG1, ADG2) and Kleiber ratio (KR1, KR2) using the ASREML program. Twelve models, formed with inclusion or exclusion of the maternal genetic, permanent environmental and common (litter) environmental variance components and the covariance between the direct and maternal additive effect on the basic direct additive genetic model, were used. The same models were applied to birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT) and bi-monthly weights to 12 months of age (WT2 to WT12), and weight at 18 months of age (WT18). Two-trait analyses were done among all traits. Maternal genetic and common environmental components were found to be important for ADG1, KR1 and weights up to six-months of age, while the common environmental component was found to be important for ADG2 and KR2. The maternal permanent environmental component was important for WT2 and WWT. Total heritability estimates for ADG1, ADG2, KR1 and KR2 were 0.13, 0.04, 0.13, and 0.01, respectively. Direct genetic correlations of ADG1 with BWT, WWT and WT6 were 0.01, 0.96 and 0.84 while with KR1 they were -0.40, 0.75 and 0.66, respectively. The relatively higher heritability in weight traits and the presence of positive and high correlations of weight traits with daily gain and Kleiber ratio tend to suggest that it would be more practical to select on the weight traits to improve gain and efficiency.

/pdf/model-comparisons-and-genetic-and-environmental-parameter-2s5b6b8u39.pdf

J.B. van Wyk

Papers

Genetic parameter estimates in sabi sheep

Direct and maternal (co) variance components and heritability estimates for body weight at different ages and fleece traits in Afrino sheep

Genetic parameter estimates for pre-weaning weight traits in Dorper sheep.

Characterisation of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality traits

Model comparisons and genetic and environmental parameter estimates of growth and the Kleiber ratio in Horro sheep