J
J. Jeffrey Inman
Researcher at University of Pittsburgh
Publications - 114
Citations - 12654
J. Jeffrey Inman is an academic researcher from University of Pittsburgh. The author has contributed to research in topics: Shopper marketing & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 112 publications receiving 11130 citations. Previous affiliations of J. Jeffrey Inman include National Center for Genome Resources & NorthShore University HealthSystem.
Papers
More filters
Journal Article
Spending on the Fly: Mental Budgets, Promotions, and Spending Behavior
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined how the impact of promotions depends on whether the shopper still had in-store slack remaining in his or her mental budget. And they found that savings on planned items lead to stockpiling by higher-income shoppers when the savings occur before the in-Store slack has been depleted but lead to increased purchase of unplanned items when they occur afte...
Journal ArticleDOI
A Retailer Promotion Policy Model Considering Promotion Signal Sensitivity
J. Jeffrey Inman,Leigh McAlister +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a model of retailer profitability that incorporates this "promotion signal sensitivity" and compared the profitability of two other promotion policy-setting paradigms: a model-based policy that does not consider promotion signal sensitivity and one prescribed by industry experts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Incidental and Task-Related Affect: A Re-Inquiry and Extension of the Influence of Affect on Choice
TL;DR: The authors examine the interplay between incidental affect and task-related affect in the context of consumer choice and find that consumers are more likely to rely on a status quo option when they have to make emotionally difficult trade-offs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Image Reinforcement or Impairment: The Effects of Co-Branding on Attribute Uncertainty
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of co-branding on attribute uncertainty of partner brands are investigated, and it is shown that it is not necessarily in a brand's best interest to choose a partner that is of the highest performance possible, while under certain conditions, uncertainty associated with the brands increases through the alliance, increasing the risk of image impairment.