/pdf/european-evidence-based-consensus-on-the-prevention-2i61racmdl.pdf

European evidence-based Consensus on the prevention, diagnosis and management of opportunistic infections in inflammatory bowel disease.

Objectives To review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of biological agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to provide data to develop treatment recommendations by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Task Force. Methods Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles on infliximab (IFX), etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab-pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), anakinra (ANA), abatacept (ABT), rituximab (RTX) and tocilizumab (TCZ) published between 1962 and February 2009; published abstracts from the 2007–2008 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR conference were obtained. Results 87 articles and 40 abstracts were identified. In methotrexate (MTX) naive patients, biological therapy with IFX, ETN, ADA, GLM or ABT has been shown to improve clinical outcomes (level of evidence 1B). In MTX/other synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) failures all nine biological agents confer benefit (1B), with lower efficacy noted for ANA. RTX, ABT, TCZ and GLM demonstrate efficacy in tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failures (1B). Less evidence exists for switching between IFX, ETN and ADA (3B). Biological and MTX combination therapy is more efficacious than a biological agent alone (1B). A safety review shows no increased malignancy risk compared with conventional DMARDs (3B). TNFi are generally associated with an increased risk of serious bacterial infection, particularly within the first 6 months of treatment initiation; increased tuberculosis (TB) rates with TNFi are highest with the monoclonal antibodies (3B). Conclusions There is good evidence for the efficacy of biological agents in patients with RA. Safety data confirm an increased risk of bacterial infection and TB with TNFi compared with conventional DMARDs.

https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/69/6/976.full.pdf

Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of RA

Background Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may be associated with opportunistic infections (OIs). Objective To describe the spectrum of non-tuberculosis OIs associated with anti-TNF therapy and identify their risk factors. Methods A 3-year national French registry (RATIO) collected all cases of OI in patients receiving anti-TNF treatment for any indication in France. A case–control study was performed with three controls treated with anti-TNF agents per case, matched for gender and underlying inflammatory disease. Results 45 cases were collected of non-TB OIs in 43 patients receiving infliximab (n=29), adalimumab (n=10) or etanercept (n=4) for rheumatoid arthritis (n=26), spondyloarthritides (n=3), inflammatory colitis (n=8), psoriasis (n=1) or other conditions (n=5). One-third (33%) of OIs were bacterial (4 listeriosis, 4 nocardiosis, 4 atypical mycobacteriosis, 3 non-typhoid salmonellosis), 40% were viral (8 severe herpes zoster, 3 varicella, 3 extensive herpes simplex, 4 disseminated cytomegalovirus infections), 22% were fungal (5 pneumocystosis, 3 invasive aspergillosis, 2 cryptococcosis) and 4% were parasitic (2 leishmaniasis). Ten patients (23%) required admission to the intensive care unit, and four patients (9%) died. Risk factors for OIs were treatment with infliximab (OR=17.6 (95% CI 4.3 - 72.9); p 10 mg/day or intravenous boluses during the previous year (OR=6.3 (2.0 to 20.0); p=0.002). Conclusion Various and severe OIs, especially those with intracellular micro-organisms, may develop in patients receiving anti-TNF treatment. Monoclonal anti-TNF antibody rather than soluble TNF receptor therapy and steroid use >10 mg/day are independently associated with OI.

https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/early/2010/12/20/ard.2010.137422.full.pdf

Drug-specific risk of non-tuberculosis opportunistic infections in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy reported to the 3-year prospective French RATIO registry

The Risk of Infections with Biologic Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objectives. Clinical registries have shown their effectiveness in capturing the long-term benefit of drugs in routine care. In France, two types of registry have been established to analyse the safety and efficacy of biological agents. Methods. The Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies (RATIO) registry was designed to prospectively collect all cases of lymphoma and opportunistic infections occurring in patients receiving anti-TNF blockers for any indication. We also examined the results from nationwide prospective cohorts in order to investigate the safety and efficacy of rituximab (RTX), abatacept (ABA) and tocilizumab in RA and other autoimmune diseases. Results. Analysis of the RATIO registry demonstrated an increased risk of Legionella pneumophila infection in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, a higher risk of tuberculosis [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 13.3 (2.6, 69.0) and 17.1 (3.6, 80.6) for infliximab and adalimumab vs etanercept, respectively], opportunistic infections and incidence of lymphoma, with mAb than with soluble-receptor anti-TNF. The characteristics of RA patients in RTX and ABA registries showed that some patients did not receive previous TNF blockers [20% in autoimmunity and RTX (AIR) and 13% in Orencia and RA (ORA)] and one-third of them were treated without concomitant DMARDs. Patients receiving RTX showed an increased proportion of severe infections (5.0/100 patient-years). Lung and cardiac comorbidities, extra-articular involvement and low immunoglobulin G before RTX were predictive factors of severe infections. In addition, the AIR registry suggested the effectiveness of RTX in patients with SLE. Conclusion. The establishment of biological registries in rheumatic diseases, in France, with their different methods, has already provided additional data to controlled trials, mainly on the risk of severe infections and lymphoma.

/pdf/registries-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-autoimmune-diseases-5bx795kosq.pdf

Registries in rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune diseases: data from the French registries

Background Patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonists have an increased risk of infection, but infection due to Legionella pneumophila has rarely been described in patients receiving such therapy. Methods A registry involving 486 clinical departments in France was designed by a multidisciplinary group (Recherche Axee sur la Tolerance des Biotherapies [RATIO]) to collect data on opportunistic and severe infections occurring in patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists. All cases are reported to RATIO in accordance with national health authorities and validated by infectious disease experts. The legionellosis rate among patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists was compared with the rate in France overall. Results We report a 1-year consecutive series of 10 cases of L. pneumophila pneumonia in France in 2004, including 6 cases treated with adalimumab, 2 treated with etanercept, and 2 treated with infliximab. The median patient age was 51 years (range, 40-69 years). Eight patients were treated for rheumatoid arthritis, 1 was treated for cutaneous psoriasis, and 1 was treated for pyoderma gangrenosum. The median duration of TNF-alpha antagonist treatment at onset of infection was 38.5 weeks (range, 3-73 weeks). Eight patients were receiving concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, and 6 were receiving treatment with methotrexate. The relative risk of legionellosis when receiving treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist, compared with the relative risk in France overall, was estimated to be between 16.5 and 21.0. We also report a second episode of confirmed legionellosis following the reintroduction of infliximab therapy. Conclusions L. pneumophila pneumonia is a potentially severe but curable infection that might complicate anti-TNF-alpha therapy. In patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha who develop pneumonia, legionellosis should be systematically investigated, and first-line antibiotic therapy should be efficient against L. pneumophila.

J. Leport

Papers

Emergence of Legionella pneumophila Pneumonia in Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor–α Antagonists