scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "James B. Skatrud published in 1991"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: During NREM sleep, inspiratory and expiratory muscles respond to internal inspiratory resistive loads and the associated dynamic airway narrowing and turbulent flow developed throughout inspiration, and the abdominal muscles are the most sensitive to load and CO2 and the diaphragm is the least sensitive.
Abstract: To investigate the response of inspiratory and expiratory muscles to naturally occurring inspiratory resistive loads in the absence of conscious control, five male "snorers" were studied during non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep with and without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Diaphragm (EMGdi) and scalene (EMGsc) electromyographic activity were monitored with surface electrodes and abdominal EMG activity (EMGab) with wire electrodes. Subjects were studied in the following conditions: 1) awake, 2) stage 2 sleep, 3) stage 3/4 sleep, 4) CPAP during stage 3/4 sleep, 5) CPAP plus end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) isocapnic to stage 2 sleep, and 6) CPAP plus PETCO2 isocapnic to stage 3/4 sleep. Inspired pulmonary resistance (RL) at peak flow rate and PETCO2 increased in all stages of sleep. Activity of EMGdi, EMGsc, and EMGab increased significantly in stage 3/4 sleep. CPAP reduced RL at peak flow, increased tidal volume and expired ventilation, and reduced PETCO2. EMGdi and EMGsc were reduced, and EMGab was silenced. During CPAP, with CO2 added to make PETCO2 isocapnic to stage 3/4 sleep, EMGsc and EMGab increased, but EMGdi was augmented in only one-half of the trials. EMG activity in this condition, however, was only 75% (EMGsc) and 43% (EMGab) of the activity observed during eupneic breathing in stage 3/4 sleep when PETCO2 was equal but RL was much higher. We conclude that during NREM sleep 1) inspiratory and expiratory muscles respond to internal inspiratory resistive loads and the associated dynamic airway narrowing and turbulent flow developed throughout inspiration, 2) some of the augmentation of respiratory muscle activity is also due to the hypercapnia that accompanies loading, and 3) the abdominal muscles are the most sensitive to load and CO2 and the diaphragm is the least sensitive.

60 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Upper airway dilating muscles appear to be recruited in a coordinated fashion with inspiratory muscles in normal humans during NREM sleep and the implications of these findings in patients with obstructive sleep apnea are not clear.
Abstract: We investigated the effect of different levels of hypercapnia on total pulmonary resistance (Rl) in 13 subjects ranging from nonsnorers with low Rl to snorers with high Rl and dynamic narrowing of the upper airway during inspiration. Added CO2 was adjusted to achieve a steady-state increase in PetCO2 of +2, +4, or +6 mm Hg. Rl was measured at peak inspiratory flow (Rlpf), at maximal resistance within breath (Rlmax), and at 10 equally spaced points within inspiration in several trials. During wakefulness, hypercapnia was associated with decreased Rlmax. During steady state +6 mm Hg hypercapnia, Rlmax decreased by 30% (p < 0.01). During NREM sleep, low levels of hypercapnia did not affect Rl. However, +6 mm Hg hypercapnia was associated with decreased Rlmax in six of eight subjects (p = 0.07), especially in subjects with high Rlmax during room air breathing. The effects of hypercapnia on Rlpf paralleled its effect on Rlmax. We concluded that (1) the decrease in Rl during awake hypercapnia suggests an increa...

54 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that neuromechanical feedback causes highly significant inhibition of inspiratory muscle activity during mechanical ventilation; upper and lower airway receptors do not appear to mediate this effect.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a neuromechanical inhibitory effect on respiratory muscle activity during mechanical ventilation and to determine whether upper and lower airway receptors provide this inhibitory feedback. Several protocols were completed during mechanical ventilation: (1) positive and negative pressure changes in the upper airway, (2) airway anesthesia to examine the consequences of receptor blockade on respiratory muscle activity, (3) increasing FRC with positive end-expiratory pressure to study the effect of hyperinflation or stretch on respiratory muscle activity, and (4) use of heart-lung transplant patients to determine the effects of vagal denervation on respiratory muscle activity. All subjects were mechanically hyperventilated with positive pressure until inspiratory muscle activity was undetectable and the end-tidal PCO2 decreased to less than 30 mm Hg. End-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) was increased by either adding CO2 to the inspired gas or decreasing tidal volume (50 ml/min). The PETCO2 where a change in inspiratory muscle activity occurred was taken as the recruitment threshold (PCO2RT). Neuromechanical feedback caused significant inspiratory muscle inhibition during mechanical ventilation, as evidenced by the difference between PCO2RT and PETCO2 during spontaneous eupnea (45 +/- 4 versus 39 +/- 4 mm Hg) and a lower PCO2RT when tidal volume was reduced with a constant frequency and fraction of inspired CO2. Recruitment threshold was unchanged during positive and negative pressure ventilation, during upper and lower airway anesthesia, and in vagally denervated lung transplant patients. These findings demonstrate that neuromechanical feedback causes highly significant inhibition of inspiratory muscle activity during mechanical ventilation; upper and lower airway receptors do not appear to mediate this effect.

53 citations