Examines whether the positive association between social support and well-being is attributable more to an overall beneficial effect of support (main- or direct-effect model) or to a process of support protecting persons from potentially adverse effects of stressful events (buffering model). The review of studies is organized according to (1) whether a measure assesses support structure (the existence of relationships) or function (the extent to which one's interpersonal relationships provide particular resources) and (2) the degree of specificity (vs globality) of the scale. Special attention is given to methodological characteristics that are requisite for a fair comparison of the models. It is concluded that there is evidence consistent with both models. Evidence for the buffering model is found when the social support measure assesses the perceived availability of interpersonal resources that are responsive to the needs elicited by stressful events. Evidence for a main effect model is found when the support measure assesses a person's degree of integration in a large social network. Both conceptualizations of social support are correct in some respects, but each represents a different process through which social support may affect well-being. Implications for theories of social support processes and for the design of preventive interventions are discussed.

/pdf/stress-social-support-and-the-buffering-hypothesis-37b7abjbst.pdf

Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign

The development of a self-report measure of subjectively assessed social support, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), is described. Subjects included 136 female and 139 male university undergraduates. Three subscales, each addressing a different source of support, were identified and found to have strong factorial validity: (a) Family, (b) Friends, and (c) Significant Other. In addition, the research demonstrated that the MSPSS has good internal and test-retest reliability as well as moderate construct validity. As predicted, high levels of perceived social support were associated with low levels of depression and anxiety symptomatology as measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Gender differences with respect to the MSPSS are also presented. The value of the MSPSS as a research instrument is discussed, along with implications for future research.

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

Recent scientific work has established both a theoretical basis and strong empirical evidence for a causal impact of social relationships on health. Prospective studies, which control for baseline health status, consistently show increased risk of death among persons with a low quantity, and sometimes low quality, of social relationships. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of humans and animals also suggest that social isolation is a major risk factor for mortality from widely varying causes. The mechanisms through which social relationships affect health and the factors that promote or inhibit the development and maintenance of social relationships remain to be explored.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/241/4865/540.full.pdf

Social relationships and health.

Introduction 1. Woman's Place in Man's Life Cycle 2. Images of Relationship 3. Concepts of Self and Morality 4. Crisis and Transition 5. Women's Rights and Women's Judgment 6. Visions of Maturity References Index of Study Participants General Index

In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982.

Reply to Guest

Social Structure and the Health Behaviors of Blacks

Review Essay: Social Psychology: Interpreting the Data@@@Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology

A Double Review from Two Disciplines

The Healthy Environments Partnership is a community-based participatory research partnership investigating the contribution of neighborhood environments to racial disparities in cardiovascular health. HEP designed and implemented the Neighborhood Observational Checklist to document aspects of neighborhood physical and social environments. In this article, we use HEP's experiences with the checklist to discuss challenges and facilitators as well as benefits to universities involved in communitybased participatory research. We identify strategies universities can employ to support community-based participatory research.

Use of Community-Based Participatory Research to Assess Environmental Determinants of Health: Challenges, Facilitators, and Implications for Universities

James S. House

Papers

Reply to Guest

Social Structure and the Health Behaviors of Blacks

Review Essay: Social Psychology: Interpreting the Data@@@Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology

A Double Review from Two Disciplines

Use of Community-Based Participatory Research to Assess Environmental Determinants of Health: Challenges, Facilitators, and Implications for Universities