J
James Thomas
Researcher at Institute of Education
Publications - 122
Citations - 16035
James Thomas is an academic researcher from Institute of Education. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 118 publications receiving 13003 citations. Previous affiliations of James Thomas include University College London & University of London.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
James Thomas,Angela Harden +1 more
TL;DR: Thematic synthesis is presented as a tried and tested method that preserves an explicit and transparent link between conclusions and the text of primary studies; as such it preserves principles that have traditionally been important to systematic reviewing.
Journal ArticleDOI
Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
Elaine Barnett-Page,James Thomas +1 more
TL;DR: Methods for qualitative synthesis vary across a range of dimensions and broadly fall into 'realist' or 'idealist' epistemologies, which partly accounts for these differences.
Journal ArticleDOI
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
TL;DR: Timely access to good quality and relevant research evidence, collaborations with policymakers and relationship- and skills-building with policymakers are reported to be the most important factors in influencing the use of evidence.
Book
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews
TL;DR: In this paper, Gough, Sandy Oliver, Kelly Dickson, and Mark Newman introduced the Systematic Reviews, a set of stakeholders' perspectives and participation in reviews, and discussed the importance of diversity and inclusion in reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods
TL;DR: It is argued that the current proliferation of types of systematic reviews creates challenges for the terminology for describing such reviews and it is proposed that the most useful strategy for the field is to develop terminology for the main dimensions of variation.