scispace - formally typeset
J

Jan Hanspach

Researcher at Lüneburg University

Publications -  94
Citations -  5626

Jan Hanspach is an academic researcher from Lüneburg University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Biodiversity & Species richness. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 86 publications receiving 4732 citations. Previous affiliations of Jan Hanspach include Australian National University & Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a semiquantitative review of publications explicitly dealing with cultural ecosystem services and identified five groups of publications: conceptual focus, conceptual focus deals with theoretical issues; Group 2, descriptive reviews, consists mostly of desktop studies; Group 3, localized outcomes, deals with case studies coming from different disciplines; Group 4, social and participatory, deals mainly with assessing preferences and perceptions; and Group 5, economic assessments, provides economic valuations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward

TL;DR: In this paper, a framework has been proposed that distinguishes between the integration (land sharing) and separation (land sparing) of conservation and production to address the challenges of biodiversity conservation and commodity production.
Posted Content

Land sparing versus land sharing: Moving forward

TL;DR: In this paper, a framework has been proposed that distinguishes between the integration (land sharing) and separation (land sparing) of conservation and production of commodity production to address the challenges of biodiversity conservation and commodity production.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability

TL;DR: This article reviewed the current state of research on ecosystem services, and examined whether the concept's original motivation has allowed it to act as an effective boundary object for the integration of the diverse knowledge related to sustainability.