scispace - formally typeset
J

Jan Vanthienen

Researcher at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Publications -  299
Citations -  11665

Jan Vanthienen is an academic researcher from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The author has contributed to research in topics: Process mining & Decision table. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 291 publications receiving 10299 citations. Previous affiliations of Jan Vanthienen include The Catholic University of America.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

A full R/I-net construct lexicon for declare constraints

TL;DR: In this article, a template-based conversion is proposed of every Declare constraint into a single Petri net fragment with weighted, reset and inhibitor arcs, i.e. a weighted R/I-net.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Making Business Environments Smarter: A Context-Adaptive Petri Net Approach

TL;DR: This paper extends CPN with ontologies, which not only allows the modeling and execution of context-adaptive Petri nets, but also improves system design, reuse, and maintenance by dealing with context and business behavior as separate concerns.
Proceedings Article

Modeling business decisions and processes – which comes first?

TL;DR: This approach aims to develop a roadmap for the modeling of business processes based on decisions structures, and examines the challenges that arise when such decision structures are eventually transformed into more optimal execution-system geared business processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving a neuro-fuzzy classifier using exploratory factor analysis

TL;DR: This paper studies the performance of a recently developed and improved classifier that integrates fuzzy set theory in a neural network (NEFCLASS) and compares the algorithms before and after applying an exploratory factor analysis on leading performance indicators.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Scoping Review of the Digital Transformation Literature Using Scientometric Analysis.

TL;DR: In this article, a scoping review of the knowledge structure of the research field using scientometrics was conducted to understand the impact of digital transformation on both business and society, highlighting the broad scope of research field, ambiguity of the terminology, the lack of collaboration, and the absence of research into the impact on society.