When the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC; A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman,. 1983a, 1983b) was published just over 10 years ago, it had many nal Kaufman Assessment Battery for. Children (K-ABC) (Kaufman &. Kaufman, 1983) in both its theoretical conception and structure. This chapter will provide a The first edition of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. (KABC; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1983) was a ground-breaking measure. Unlike most tests at the Mar 29, 2012 children second edition. (KABCII). Abstract. The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II; Kaufman & Kaufman,..

アメリカ合衆国におけるKaufman Assessment Battery for Childrenに関する研究動向

Background Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) frequently have difficulties with word learning and understanding vocabulary. For these children, this can significantly impact on social interactions, daily activities and academic progress. Although there is literature providing a rationale for targeting word learning in such children, there is little evidence for the effectiveness of specific interventions in this area for children with identified DLD. Aims To establish whether direct one-to-one intervention for children with DLD over 9 years of age leads to improved abilities to identify, comprehend, define, and use nouns and verbs targeted in intervention as compared with non-targeted control items and whether or not the participants' rating of their own knowledge of the words changes with intervention. Methods & procedures Twenty-five children and young people with language disorder (aged 9;4-16;1) participated in the study: 18 with DLD and seven with a language disorder associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Two assessments of different levels were created: a higher ability (less frequent words) and a lower ability (more frequent words). Participants' speech and language therapists (SLTs) decided which level would be the most appropriate for each participant. Four tasks were carried out as part of the assessment and the scores were used to identify which words each participant worked on. Participants received one 30-min session per week one-to-one with their own SLT for 7 weeks, plus a 5-min revision session in between each main session. During each of the first five sessions, participants learned two new words; the two final sessions were spent revising the 10 words which had been targeted. Outcomes & results Post-intervention assessment showed an increase in scores for both treated and control words. However, progress on treated words was significantly greater than on control words (d = 1.07), indicating effectiveness of intervention. The difference between progress on targeted and control words was found both for nouns (d = 1.29) and verbs (d = 0.64), but the effect size was larger for nouns. Whether or not the participants had an associated ASD did not affect the results. The children's self-rating of their knowledge of the targeted words was also significantly higher than for control words post-intervention. Conclusions & implications The intervention delivered one-to-one by the participants' usual SLT was effective in teaching new vocabulary to older children with language disorders. This shows that older children with language disorders can make progress with direct one-to-one intervention focused on vocabulary.

/pdf/effectiveness-of-vocabulary-intervention-for-older-children-11qtw7v3ua.pdf

Effectiveness of Vocabulary Intervention for Older Children with (Developmental) Language Disorder.

BACKGROUND:Language disorder and associated vocabulary difficulties can persist into adolescence, and can impact on long-term life outcomes. Previous reviews have shown that a variety of intervention techniques can successfully enhance students' vocabulary skills; however, none has investigated vocabulary intervention specifically for adolescents with language disorder. AIMS:To carry out a systematic review of the literature on vocabulary interventions for adolescents with language disorder. METHODS & PROCEDURES:A systematic search of 14 databases and other sources yielded 1320 studies, of which 13 met inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were: intervention effectiveness studies with a focus on enhancing oral receptive and/or expressive vocabulary skills in the study's aims; participants in the age range 11;0-16;11 with receptive and/or expressive language difficulties of any aetiology. MAIN CONTRIBUTION:There was a high degree of diversity between studies. Types of intervention included: semantic intervention (four studies); comparison of phonological versus semantic intervention (two); and combined phonological-semantic intervention (seven). The strongest evidence for effectiveness was found with a combined phonological-semantic approach. The evidence suggested a potential for all models of delivery to be helpful (individual, small group and whole class). CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS:Tentative evidence is emerging for the effectiveness of a phonological-semantic approach in enhancing the vocabulary skills of adolescents who have language disorder. Future research needs to refine and develop the methodologies used in this diverse group of studies in order to replicate their findings and to build consensus.

/pdf/vocabulary-intervention-for-adolescents-with-language-atk8jtp24d.pdf

Vocabulary intervention for adolescents with language disorder: a systematic review

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are increasingly required to read, interpret and create evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions. This requires a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different intervention study designs. This paper aims to take readers through a range of designs commonly used in speech-language pathology, working from those with the least to most experimental control, with a particular focus on how the more robust designs avoid some of the limitations of weaker designs. It then discusses the factors other than research design which need to be considered when deciding whether or not to implement an intervention in clinical practice. The final section offers some tips and advice on carrying out research in clinical practice, with the hope that more SLPs will become actively involved in creating intervention research.

/pdf/intervention-research-appraising-study-designs-interpreting-40m8v8plby.pdf

Intervention research: Appraising study designs, interpreting findings and creating research in clinical practice

Purpose Phonological–semantic intervention has been shown to be effective in enhancing the vocabulary skills of children with language disorder in small-group or individual settings. Less is known ...

https://pubs.asha.org/doi/pdf/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0337

The Effectiveness of Classroom Vocabulary Intervention for Adolescents With Language Disorder.

Word finding difficulties are often seen in children with language difficulties. Their problem is readily observed and has led to investigations of its nature and encouraged attempts at intervention. Semantic errors in their naming suggest that their knowledge of items is poorly developed and that therapies to strengthen it may be effective. Twelve children between 7 and 11 years of age were offered 3 hours of semantic therapy in two 15-minute sessions per week for 6 weeks. The children had severe and complex speech, language and communication needs and all were in the bottom 5% for their age on a test of word finding. Two categories of items were treated. Each category was divided into sets of items that were directly treated, and items which appeared during therapy but were not specifically targeted. Categories and sets of items were counterbalanced across children. The children were blind assessed on naming the items before and after therapy and at a maintenance assessment 6 weeks after the treatment c...

Jean Wilson

Papers

The effectiveness of semantic therapy for the word finding difficulties of children with severe and complex speech, language and communication needs