scispace - formally typeset
J

Jeffrey K Aronson

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  615
Citations -  20721

Jeffrey K Aronson is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 55, co-authored 523 publications receiving 17323 citations. Previous affiliations of Jeffrey K Aronson include British Pharmacological Society & National Institute for Health Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Good prescribing: benefits, hazards, harms, and risks

TL;DR: The National Prescribing Centre, now part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, published A Single Competency Framework for all Prescribers in 2012, and a draft of the revised version should appear on the website of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society later this year.
Journal ArticleDOI

When I use a word…: Sausages

Jeffrey K Aronson
- 06 Sep 1997 - 
TL;DR: I recently learnt about a rare type of neuropathy called hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies or hereditary pressure sensitive neuropathy (HPSN), also known as tomaculous neuropathy, which is associated with a deletion in chromosome 17p11.2.
Journal ArticleDOI

When I use a word . . . .Diagnosing definitions

Jeffrey K Aronson
- 24 Mar 2023 - 
TL;DR: In this article , nominal definitions come in different varieties, as it were diagnostic categories: nominal definitions are of two types, word-for-word definitions and word for-thing definitions; descriptive definitions; stipulative definitions, which can be either intensional or extensional; operational definitions; and ostensive definitions.
Journal Article

When I use a word

TL;DR: The number of monoclonal antibodies with clinical uses is bewildering, from abciximab to zolimomab aritox, but the names seem bewildering too, but are actually easy to decipher.
Journal ArticleDOI

Placebo's invisible brother: a restricted scoping review of biomedical literature on the nocebo effect.

TL;DR: In the biomedical literature there is an overabundance of non-systematic reviews and expert opinions and a lack of primary research and high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses specifically dealing with nocebo effects.