scispace - formally typeset
J

Jeremy Kees

Researcher at Villanova University

Publications -  46
Citations -  3404

Jeremy Kees is an academic researcher from Villanova University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Public policy & Framing (social sciences). The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 44 publications receiving 2870 citations. Previous affiliations of Jeremy Kees include University of Arkansas.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An Analysis of Data Quality: Professional Panels, Student Subject Pools, and Amazon's Mechanical Turk

TL;DR: The authors examines whether one popular Internet data souring trend is a good fit for social science disciplines, including advertising, and examines whether it can be used in the context of data collection using Internet based samples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Attacking the Obesity Epidemic: The Potential Health Benefits of Providing Nutrition Information in Restaurants

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how accurately consumers estimate the nutrient content of typical restaurant meals using a survey methodology and conducted an experiment to address how the provision of nutrition information on menus influences purchase intentions and reported preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Role of Self-Regulation, Future Orientation, and Financial Knowledge in Long-Term Financial Decisions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine potential explanations of why consumers have difficulty making personal financial decisions that will most beneficial in the long run, and find that consumers who express higher levels of future orientation are more likely to participate in a retirement plan.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present results from a between-subjects experiment with more than 500 smokers that test the effectiveness of pictorial warnings that vary in their graphic depiction of the warning and an underlying mechanism proposed to drive potential effects of the manipulation of the graphic depiction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is Simpler Always Better? Consumer Evaluations of Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbols

TL;DR: The authors predict and find that the SC icon can lead to positive (and potentially misleading) nutrient evaluations and product healthfulness when compared with the TL-GDA icon or no-FOP icon control, and that nutrition consciousness is more likely to moderate effects related to the Nutrition Facts Panel than the FOP nutrition icon information.