Jesse F. Dillard

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the birth and maturation of the contemporary IPA project and conclude that the undertaking is divided along methodological, philosophical, and ideological lines, and propose to clarify and differentiate the nature and purpose of contemporary IPA and critical accounting projects.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose critical dialogic accountability as a way to conceptualize accountability systems in a pluralistic society characterized by multiple, and often conflicting, interests, and present a definition of accountability that illustrates its complexity, recognizes the salience of power for accountability relationships and can be applied both descriptively and normatively, providing a framework for assisting in the specification of the accountability systems and responsibility networks of various interest groups.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the insights science and technology studies (STS) provides on opening up and closing down participatory governance, understanding knowledge-power dynamics and implications for stakeholder value creation.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reviewed 353 articles published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting from 1990 to 2014 identifying the focal constituency(s), the injustice(s) addressed, the groups or institutions responsible for the injustice as well as the proposals for social and political praxis outlined in the studies.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine how the new total quality management (TQM) technologies are being promoted within the education community and consider possible implications, using an evolutionary model of social development.