Jessica E. Dinh

TL;DR: The authors conducted an extensive qualitative review of leadership theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, academy of management review, journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, and Personnel Psychology.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop new perspectives regarding the design of behavioral measures of leadership and the implications of shared leadership and complex adaptive leadership conceptualizations of leadership, and argue that ratings which tap episodic memory at the event level may be more meaningful than ratings based on semantic memory.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the status of leadership theory integration by reviewing 14 years of published research (2000 through 2013) in 10 top journals (864 articles) and applied an inductive approach and used graphic network analysis as a guide for drawing conclusions.

TL;DR: The authors assesses the conceptual and methodological limitations associated with traditional dispositional approaches to personality and leadership, and proposes that more process-oriented approaches will better enable leadership research to explore emergent leadership phenomena such as perception and effectiveness.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a quantum approach to time and change as a framework for understanding organizational complexity and the common decision-making errors that lead to organizational failures within uncertain environments.