J
Jill H. Larkin
Researcher at Carnegie Mellon University
Publications - 36
Citations - 7445
Jill H. Larkin is an academic researcher from Carnegie Mellon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Higher education & Science education. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 36 publications receiving 7221 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words
Jill H. Larkin,Herbert A. Simon +1 more
TL;DR: This work describes systems that are informationally equivalent and that can be characterized as sentential or diagrammatic, and contrasts the computational efficiency of these representotions for solving several illustrative problems in mothematics and physics.
Journal ArticleDOI
Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
TL;DR: Although a sizable body of knowledge is prerequisite to expert skill, that knowledge must be indexed by large numbers of patterns that, on recognition, guide the expert in a fraction of a second to relevant parts of the knowledge store.
Journal ArticleDOI
Models of Competence in Solving Physics Problems
TL;DR: A set of two computer-implemented models that solve physics problems in ways characteristic of more and less competent human solvers are described, providing a good account of the order in which principles are applied by humansolvers working problems in kinematics and dynamics.
Journal ArticleDOI
An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems.
Diane J. Briars,Jill H. Larkin +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a model of the psychological processes of a child solving arithmetic word problems is presented, made explicit in the form of a computer-implemented model, and the model solves many common word problems by acting them out with representations of physical counters.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications.
Frederick Reif,Jill H. Larkin +1 more
TL;DR: An analysis and comparison of everyday life and the domain of science reveals significant differences in their goals and in the cognitive means used to attain these goals as mentioned in this paper, which can lead to pervasive learning difficulties in their study of science.