scispace - formally typeset
J

Jing Zhang

Researcher at Lamar University

Publications -  14
Citations -  219

Jing Zhang is an academic researcher from Lamar University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Convolutional neural network & Eigenface. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 14 publications receiving 94 citations.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Image-based air quality analysis using deep convolutional neural network

TL;DR: This paper uses a deep Convolutional Neural Network to classify natural images into different categories based on their PM2.5 concentrations, and the experimental results demonstrate that the method are valid for image-based PM 2.5 concentration estimation.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Ensemble of Deep Neural Networks for Estimating Particulate Matter from Images

TL;DR: A proposed ensemble of deep neural networks-based regression, which uses a feedforward neural network to combine the PM2.5 predictions yielded by three convolutional neural networks, VGG-16, Inception-v3, and ResNet50, can be used for image-based PM 2.5 monitoring.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Particle Pollution Estimation from Images Using Convolutional Neural Network and Weather Features

TL;DR: This paper combines image and weather information to estimate indices of outdoor images using deep learning and support vector regression (SVR) techniques and demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method for PM2.5 estimation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep transfer learning for gesture recognition with WiFi signals

TL;DR: A new approach that uses deep transfer learning techniques to recognize gestures based on the channel state information (CSI) extracted from WiFi signals and demonstrates that the proposed method outperformed other state-of-the-art WiFi-based gesture recognition methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the Performance of Eigenface, Fisherface, and Local Binary Pattern Histogram-Based Facial Recognition Methods under Various Weather Conditions

TL;DR: Computers show a significant difference among the three FR techniques in terms of overall time complexity and accuracy, and LBPH outperforms the other two FR algorithms on both LUDB and 5_Celebrity datasets by achieving 40% and 95% accuracy, respectively.