scispace - formally typeset
J

Joanna Wolfe

Researcher at Carnegie Mellon University

Publications -  40
Citations -  975

Joanna Wolfe is an academic researcher from Carnegie Mellon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Teamwork & Professional writing. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 36 publications receiving 893 citations. Previous affiliations of Joanna Wolfe include University of Texas at Austin & University of Louisville.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Annotation Technologies: A Software and Research Review.

TL;DR: A range of currently available and developing technologies for creating and presenting annotations, glosses, and other comments on digital documents are described and composition researchers are urged to engage in research that will influence the design of future annotation technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

From the Margins to the Center The Future of Annotation

TL;DR: The importance of annotation to reading and writing practices is described and new technologies that complicate the ways annotation can be used to support and enhance traditional reading, writing, and collaboration processes are reviewed.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Effects of annotations on student readers and writers

TL;DR: Results indicate that annotations improve recall of emphasized items, influence how specific arguments in the source materials are perceived, decrease students' tendencies to unnecessarily summarize, and implications for the design and implementation of digitally annotated materials are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Annotations and the collaborative digital library: Effects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies

TL;DR: It is found that students who received annotated materials both perceived themselves and were perceived by instructors as less reliant on unreflective summary strategies thanStudents who received the same content but in a different format.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biases in Interpersonal Communication: How Engineering Students Perceive Gender Typical Speech Acts in Teamwork

TL;DR: This paper found that male engineering students were significantly harsher than other groups on female typical speech acts in which the speaker conceded weaknesses, even if this concession was for strategic purposes such as trying to help another teammate "save face".