J
Joel R. Primack
Researcher at University of California, Santa Cruz
Publications - 492
Citations - 55170
Joel R. Primack is an academic researcher from University of California, Santa Cruz. The author has contributed to research in topics: Galaxy & Galaxy formation and evolution. The author has an hindex of 101, co-authored 483 publications receiving 50646 citations. Previous affiliations of Joel R. Primack include Stanford University & Harvard University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
High-redshift Galaxy Formation with Self-consistently Modeled Stars and Massive Black Holes: Stellar Feedback and Quasar Growth.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce a self-consistent numerical framework that includes explicit treatments of feedback from star-forming molecular clouds (SFMCs) and massive black holes (MBHs).
Journal ArticleDOI
Constraining the IMF using TeV gamma ray absorption
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined how gamma ray absorption may be used as an indirect probe of the stellar initial mass function (IMF), although there is a degeneracy with dust modeling.
Cold + Hot Dark Matter After Super-Kamiokande
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the possible improvement of the low-$Omega_m$ flat (LCDM) cosmological models with the addition of light neutrinos appears to be rather limited.
Journal ArticleDOI
CANDELS Meets GSWLC: Evolution of the Relationship Between Morphology and Star Formation Since z = 2.
Chandler Osborne,Samir Salim,Ivana Damjanov,Sandra M. Faber,Marc Huertas-Company,David C. Koo,Kameswara Bharadwaj Mantha,Daniel H. McIntosh,Joel R. Primack,Sandro Tacchella +9 more
TL;DR: In this article, the relationship between morphology and star formation has been studied by using consistent SED fitting with flexible dust attenuation laws, and it was shown that the clumpy disk contribution to the star formation budget peaks at z ~ 1, rather than z ~ 2, suggesting that the principal epoch of disk assembly continues to lower redshift.
Journal ArticleDOI
Public-Interest Science-- An Overview.
TL;DR: The idea that the public, as well as the government and industry should have scientific advisors is an old one as discussed by the authors, yet it was not until the 1960's that a renewed public understanding of the insensitivity of governmental and industrial bureaucracies led to a substantial commitment in the legal profession to public-interest law.