J
John A. Jaeger
Researcher at University of Rochester
Publications - 8
Citations - 3255
John A. Jaeger is an academic researcher from University of Rochester. The author has contributed to research in topics: RNA & Protein secondary structure. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 8 publications receiving 3208 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability
Susan M. Freier,Ryszard Kierzek,John A. Jaeger,Naoki Sugimoto,Marvin H. Caruthers,Thomas Neilson,Douglas H. Turner +6 more
TL;DR: These parameters predict melting temperatures of most oligonucleotide duplexes within 5 degrees C, about as good as can be expected from the nearest-neighbor model.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improved predictions of secondary structures for RNA.
TL;DR: The accuracy of computer predictions of RNA secondary structure from sequence data and free energy parameters has been increased to roughly 70% and the excellent performance is consistent with these interactions being the primary interactions determiningRNA secondary structure.
Book ChapterDOI
Predicting optimal and suboptimal secondary structure for RNA
TL;DR: LRNA folds linear sequences, and CRNA folds circular sequences: two versions of the program that rely on alignment and subsequent folding of several sequences into similar structures for functionally analogous RNA.
Journal ArticleDOI
A comparison of optimal and suboptimal RNA secondary structures predicted by free energy minimization with structures determined by phylogenetic comparison
TL;DR: The latest version of an RNA folding algorithm that predicts both optimal and suboptimal solutions based on free energy minimization is described, finding a structure about 80% correct is found with a free energy within 2% of the predicted lowest free energy structure.
Journal ArticleDOI
Thermal unfolding of a group I ribozyme: the low-temperature transition is primarily disruption of tertiary structure.
TL;DR: The results indicate that increasing temperature disrupts tertiary interactions before disrupting secondary structure, which suggests tertiary interaction are weaker than secondary interactions in this case and support an important assumption for RNA structure prediction: that secondary structure dominates the free energy of folding.