scispace - formally typeset
J

John A. Wilhelm

Researcher at University of Texas at Austin

Publications -  18
Citations -  1935

John A. Wilhelm is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Austin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Crew resource management. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 18 publications receiving 1861 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.

TL;DR: An overarching framework that stresses error management to increase acceptance of CRM concepts is presented and defines behavioral strategies taught in CRM as error countermeasures that are employed to avoid error, to trap errors committed, and to mitigate the consequences of error.
Journal ArticleDOI

A psychometric analysis of the personal attributes questionnaire

TL;DR: The psychometric properties of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire were examined in independent samples of male and female high school students, college students, and adults as discussed by the authors, showing that a two-factor structure paralleling the empirically derived scales was found.

Culture, error, and crew resource management.

TL;DR: The influences of three cultures that are relevant to the cockpit are described: the professional cultures of the pilots, the cultures of organizations, and the national cultures surrounding individuals and their organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcomes of crew resource management training.

TL;DR: Findings indicate that crew resource management training is favorably received and causes highly significant, positive changes in attitudes regarding crew coordination and personal capabilities, but a subset of participants reacted negatively to the training and showed boomerangs in attitudes.
Journal ArticleDOI

The structure of cockpit management attitudes

TL;DR: A revised version of the Cockpit Management Attitudes Questionnaire (CMAQ) is introduced in this paper, and factor analyses of responses from three different samples reveal comparable factor structure (previous attempts to factor analyze this measure had produced equivocal results).