scispace - formally typeset
J

Jonas Adler

Researcher at Royal Institute of Technology

Publications -  35
Citations -  14475

Jonas Adler is an academic researcher from Royal Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Artificial neural network & Inverse problem. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 34 publications receiving 2551 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

A modified fuzzy C means algorithm for shading correction in craniofacial CBCT images

TL;DR: In this paper, a new shading correction approach that is independent of planning CT images is presented, based on the assumption that true CBCT images follow a uniform volumetric intensity distribution per material, and scatter perturbs this uniform texture by contributing cupping and shading artifacts in the image domain.
Posted Content

Multi-Scale Learned Iterative Reconstruction

TL;DR: A hybrid network that combines the multi-scale iterative approach with a particularly expressive network architecture which in combination exhibits excellent scalability in 3D is proposed.

Spectral CT reconstruction with anti-correlated noise model and joint prior

Mats Persson, +1 more
TL;DR: Spectral CT allows reconstructing a set of material selective basis images which can be used for material quantification and these basis images can be reconstructed independently of each other or treat ...
Proceedings Article

Kernel of CycleGAN as a principal homogeneous space

TL;DR: It is concluded that finding optimal solutions to the CycleGAN loss does not necessarily lead to the envisioned result in image-to-image translation tasks and that underlying hidden symmetries can render the result useless.
Book ChapterDOI

A modified fuzzy C means algorithm for shading correction in craniofacial CBCT images

TL;DR: The proposed algorithm is practical and qualifies as a plug and play extension into any CBCT reconstruction software for shading correction and improves thresholding based segmentation accuracy for bone pixels from 85% to 91% when compared to thresholding without shading-correction.