J
Jonathan M. Golding
Researcher at University of Kentucky
Publications - 108
Citations - 3099
Jonathan M. Golding is an academic researcher from University of Kentucky. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Sexual abuse. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 98 publications receiving 2825 citations. Previous affiliations of Jonathan M. Golding include University of Denver & University of Memphis.
Papers
More filters
BookDOI
Intentional Forgetting : Interdisciplinary Approaches
TL;DR: Directed forgetting as discussed by the authors has been extensively studied in the literature, including in the field of neuroscience, psychology, neuroscience, and psychology education, where it has been shown to have a profound effect on memory, judgment, and behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming
TL;DR: This paper used lexical decision and word-naming tasks to determine whether subjects infer highly likely consequences of an event while reading, such as if someone falls off a 14th story roof, will they infer that the person died?
Journal ArticleDOI
Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.
Brian H. Bornstein,Jonathan M. Golding,Jeffrey S. Neuschatz,Christopher D. Kimbrough,Krystia Reed,Casey L. Magyarics,Katherine M. Luecht +6 more
TL;DR: The question of sample differences (student v. nonstudent) in jury research was meta-analyzed for 6 dependent variables and revealed that guilty verdicts, culpability ratings, and damage awards did not vary with sample.
Journal ArticleDOI
When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.
TL;DR: This article found that potential jurors judged children to be less credible eyewitnesses than adults, regardless of the sample tested (college students versus a more heterogeneous group), the type of trial presented (vehicular homicide versus murder), or the medium employed (written trial descriptions versus videotaped mock trial).
Journal ArticleDOI
Jurors' Reactions to Child Witnesses
TL;DR: This article reviewed juror, witness, and courtroom factors that influence a child's credibility and found that adults often do not know when to believe children, and that this uncertainty is more consequential than in a court of law where jurors may be forced to base their verdict largely on the testimony of children.