J
Joshua M. Wilson
Researcher at Duke University
Publications - 43
Citations - 1257
Joshua M. Wilson is an academic researcher from Duke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Imaging phantom & Image quality. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 43 publications receiving 1054 citations. Previous affiliations of Joshua M. Wilson include Durham University & DePauw University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.
TL;DR: Scanner and reconstruction parameters can significantly affect SUV measurements and recommendations on ways to minimize when using serial PET to assess early response to therapy are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI
A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems.
TL;DR: Phantom and image quality analysis software were created for assessing CT image quality over a range of contrasts, doses, and body sizes capable of characterizing the performance of reconstruction algorithms and tube current modulation techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods.
TL;DR: A methodology was developed to measure three-dimensional CT noise and resolution properties for iterative reconstruction, especially at challenging measurement conditions with low contrast and high image noise, and demonstrated its utility for evaluating commercial CT systems.
Journal ArticleDOI
Impact of Dual-Energy Multi–Detector Row CT with Virtual Monochromatic Imaging on Renal Cyst Pseudoenhancement: In Vitro and in Vivo Study
Achille Mileto,Rendon C. Nelson,Ehsan Samei,Tracy A. Jaffe,Erik K. Paulson,Andrew Barina,Kingshuk Roy Choudhury,Joshua M. Wilson,Daniele Marin +8 more
TL;DR: Dual-energy multi-detector row CT with reconstruction of virtual monochromatic images at an optimal energy level can overcome renal cyst pseudoenhancement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
TL;DR: Image quality increased with increasing dose and decreasing phantom size and the detectability exhibited less variability with phantom size for modulated scans compared to fixed tube current scans, indicating the ADMIRE algorithm could offer comparable image quality at reduced doses or improved image quality with changing phantom size.