J
Julie E. Buring
Researcher at Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publications - 992
Citations - 146202
Julie E. Buring is an academic researcher from Brigham and Women's Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Risk factor & Prospective cohort study. The author has an hindex of 186, co-authored 950 publications receiving 132967 citations. Previous affiliations of Julie E. Buring include Boston University & University of Cologne.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
C-Reactive Protein and Other Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease in Women
TL;DR: The addition of the measurement of C-reactive protein to screening based on lipid levels may provide an improved method of identifying persons at risk for cardiovascular events.
Journal ArticleDOI
C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
TL;DR: Elevated levels of CRP and IL-6 predict the development of type 2 DM, and data support a possible role for inflammation in diabetogenesis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of C-Reactive Protein and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in the Prediction of First Cardiovascular Events
TL;DR: The data suggest that the C-reactive protein level is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than the LDL cholesterol level and that it adds prognostic information to that conveyed by the Framingham risk score.
Journal ArticleDOI
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.
Colin Baigent,Lisa Blackwell,Rory Collins,Jonathan Emberson,Jon Godwin,Richard Peto,Julie E. Buring,Charles H. Hennekens,Patricia M. Kearney,Tom W. Meade,Carlo Patrono,Maria Carla Roncaglioni,Alberto Zanchetti +12 more
TL;DR: In primary prevention without previous disease, aspirin is of uncertain net value as the reduction in occlusive events needs to be weighed against any increase in major bleeds.
Book
Epidemiology in Medicine
TL;DR: The core of the subject remains essentially simple, and a good epidemiological study should be capable of describing in such a way that all who are interested in the cause of disease can follow the argument and decide for themselves the validity of the conclusions as mentioned in this paper.