scispace - formally typeset
J

Justin Zobel

Researcher at University of Melbourne

Publications -  328
Citations -  18973

Justin Zobel is an academic researcher from University of Melbourne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Search engine indexing & Inverted index. The author has an hindex of 68, co-authored 320 publications receiving 17250 citations. Previous affiliations of Justin Zobel include Melbourne Institute of Technology & National Institutes of Health.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies

TL;DR: Bandage (a Bioinformatics Application for Navigating De novo Assembly Graphs Easily) is a tool for visualizing assembly graphs with connections that presents new possibilities for analyzing de novo assemblies that are not possible through investigation of contigs alone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inverted files for text search engines

TL;DR: This tutorial introduces the key techniques in the area of text indexing, describing both a core implementation and how the core can be enhanced through a range of extensions.
Journal ArticleDOI

SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs

TL;DR: This work presents SRST2, a read mapping-based tool for fast and accurate detection of genes, alleles and multi-locus sequence types (MLST) from WGS data, which is highly accurate and outperforms assembly-based methods in terms of both gene detection and allele assignment.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?

TL;DR: A detailed empirical investigation of the TREC results shows that the measured relative performance of systems appears to be reliable, but that recall is overestimated: it is likely that many relevant documents have not been found.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness

TL;DR: A new effectiveness metric, rank-biased precision, is introduced that is derived from a simple model of user behavior, is robust if answer rankings are extended to greater depths, and allows accurate quantification of experimental uncertainty, even when only partial relevance judgments are available.