Kaitlin T. Raimi

TL;DR: This article provided a unifying theoretical framework and used the framework to review the existing research on pro-environmental behavior spillover, identifying different decision modes as competing mechanisms that drive adoption of initial environmental behaviors with different consequences for subsequent environmental behaviors, leading to positive, negative or no spillover.

TL;DR: This research demonstrates that the IH Scale is a valid measure of the degree to which people recognize that their beliefs are fallible.

TL;DR: This article examined evidence for spillover using a meta-analysis of interventions and found that positive spillover was most likely when interventions targeted intrinsic motivation and when PEB1 and PEB2 were similar.

TL;DR: The authors found evidence for negative spillover among Democrats only, which was mediated by environmental identity: Democrats who recycled the water bottle had lower environmental identities and were less supportive of the green fund than those in the control condition.

TL;DR: Overall, the data does not indicate that younger generations experience potential losses as more acute than older generations; neither age nor generational cohort correlated with the perceived severity of environmental losses nor support for future actions to prevent them.