Karen J. Alter

TL;DR: The Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ) as discussed by the authors is one of eleven copies of the European Court of Justice and the third most active international court, and the origins and evolution of the ATJ as a transplanted judicial institution.

TL;DR: The authors investigate gender disparities in status construction in American political science, focusing on three questions: 1) Do institutions within the discipline of political science reflect or remedy gender disparities that exist in many forms of recognition, including appointments to top leadership and citations? 2) Are institutions with centralized and accountable appointment mechanisms less gender skewed compared to networked and decentralized selection processes where implicit bias may go unchecked? 3) Does leaning in help? Does the effort of women to publish and to claim a seat at leadership tables increase the likelihood that higher-level status positions will follow?

TL;DR: For instance, this article argued that there is not really an interdisciplinary attempt to advance our understanding of the influence of European law and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on European Union (EU) politics.

TL;DR: The Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ) as mentioned in this paper was created by the Andean Community in the early 1990s, and it has been used to enforce Andean Intellectual Property (IP) rules.

TL;DR: Transplanting International Courts as discussed by the authors examines the Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ) creation, doctrinal development, and contributions to the law and politics of Andean Community, seeking to understand how transplanted supranational institutions operate in practice and the strategies that international judges deploy to navigate turbulent political environments.