K
Karen L. Dugosh
Researcher at Temple University
Publications - 73
Citations - 2525
Karen L. Dugosh is an academic researcher from Temple University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Drug court & Contingency management. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 67 publications receiving 2267 citations. Previous affiliations of Karen L. Dugosh include University of Georgia & University of Pennsylvania.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Examining the efficacy of a computer facilitated HIV prevention tool in drug court
TL;DR: People who received the HIV intervention were significantly more likely to report having obtained HIV testing at some point during the study period than those in the control condition, although the effect was marginally significant when examined in a longitudinal model.
Journal ArticleDOI
Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques
TL;DR: The ICF procedure increased consent recall from 72% to 83%, compared with the CAU condition in which recall decreased from 69% to 59%, which supports the statistical and clinical utility of a combined remedial and motivational consent procedure for enhancing recall of study information and human research protections.
Journal ArticleDOI
Targeting dispositions for drug-involved offenders: A field trial of the Risk and Needs Triage (RANT)™☆☆☆
Douglas B. Marlowe,David S. Festinger,Karen L. Dugosh,Anne Caron,Marcy R. Podkopacz,Nicolle Clements +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, a field trial examined the process of assigning drug-involved offenders to dispositions based on their criminogenic risks and needs and found that recidivism was lower for participants who were assigned to an appropriate disposition given their assessment results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Neuropsychological functioning and recall of research consent information among drug court clients
David S. Festinger,Kattiya Ratanadilok,Douglas B. Marlowe,Karen L. Dugosh,Nicholas S. Patapis,David DeMatteo +5 more
TL;DR: The authors found that participants failed to recall over 65% of the consent information within 2 weeks of entering the study, and their recall was significantly correlated with verbal IQ, drug problem severity, reading ability, memory, and attention.
Journal ArticleDOI
An experimental trial of adaptive programming in drug court: outcomes at 6, 12 and 18 months
Douglas B. Marlowe,David S. Festinger,Karen L. Dugosh,Kathleen M. Benasutti,Gloria Fox,Ashley Harron +5 more
TL;DR: Adaptive programming shows promise for enhancing short-term outcomes in drug courts; however, additional efforts are needed to extend the effects beyond the first 4 to 6 months of enrollment.