scispace - formally typeset
K

Karsten J. Quint

Researcher at University of Kassel

Publications -  12
Citations -  216

Karsten J. Quint is an academic researcher from University of Kassel. The author has contributed to research in topics: Finite element method & Mixed finite element method. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 12 publications receiving 200 citations. Previous affiliations of Karsten J. Quint include Clausthal University of Technology.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A time-adaptive fluid-structure interaction method for thermal coupling

TL;DR: A semi-discrete coupled system is solved using stiffly stable SDIRK methods of higher order, where on each stage a fluid-structure-coupling problem is solved and it is shown by numerical experiments that a second order convergence rate is obtained.
Journal ArticleDOI

On plastic incompressibility within time-adaptive finite elements combined with projection techniques

TL;DR: In this article, the interpretation of quasi-static finite elements applied to constitutive equations of evolutionary-type as a solution scheme to solve globally differential-algebraic equations is treated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experimental validation of high-order time integration for non-linear heat transfer problems

TL;DR: The thermo-physical properties of steel 51CrV4 (SAE 6150) are determined and used in numerical simulations and the second order accurate method of Ellsiepen with time adaptive step-size control proves to be most efficient.
Journal ArticleDOI

Displacement control in time-adaptive non-linear finite-element analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on quasi-static problems with constitutive equations of evolutionary type and apply the Backward-Euler method or more appropriately using time-adaptive, stiffly accurate, diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods in combination with the Multilevel-Newton method.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of diagonal-implicit, linear-implicit and half-explicit Runge–Kutta methods in non-linear finite element analyses

TL;DR: It turns out that for models where linear elasticity is one ingredient in the constitutive model, the method leads to only one required LU-decomposition at the beginning of the entire computation, and in each time step, this outperforms current finite element computations.