scispace - formally typeset
K

Kay Gilbert

Researcher at University of Strathclyde

Publications -  16
Citations -  238

Kay Gilbert is an academic researcher from University of Strathclyde. The author has contributed to research in topics: Job evaluation & Knowledge economy. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 16 publications receiving 222 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book

The Meaning of Work in the New Economy

TL;DR: Work today is the same mixture of satisfaction and unpleasantness as it has always been, but the contemporary workplace is perhaps a more unstable environment than we have been used to for some time as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Role stretch’: assessing the blurring of teaching and non-teaching in the classroom assistant role in Scotland

TL;DR: In this paper, a survey of 2000 head teachers, teachers and classroom assistants and interviews with directors of education in nearly half of all Scottish local authorities found that a small number of classroom assistants in Scotland are overstepping the boundary into teaching.
Journal ArticleDOI

Generating equality? Equal pay, decentralization and the electricity supply industry

TL;DR: The authors provided a case study which charts a trade union claim for equal pay over a period often years (1984-94), which may be seen as an examination of the Whitehouse proposition at a disaggregated level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Union administrative practices: A comparative analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare union administrative practices in three countries: Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States to identify and explain similarities and differences in human resource/personnel practices and strategic planning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Promises and practices: job evaluation and equal pay forty years on!

TL;DR: The authors examines the claim made by Barbara Castle when introducing the Equal Pay Act (EPA) in 1970 that there is nothing preventing unions pressing for job evaluation schemes to achieve equal pay and concludes that the standards for selecting job evaluation and the obstacles of introducing job evaluation have significantly changed over the period.