scispace - formally typeset
K

Keiran Hardy

Researcher at Griffith University

Publications -  21
Citations -  212

Keiran Hardy is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Terrorism & Legislation. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 21 publications receiving 172 citations. Previous affiliations of Keiran Hardy include University of New South Wales.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit

TL;DR: The Australian government has ambitious aims to release greater amounts of its data to the public, but is likely this task will prove difficult due to uncertainties surrounding the reliability of de-identification and the requirements of privacy law, as well as a public service culture which is yet to fully embrace the open data movement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Resilience in UK counter-terrorism:

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare resilience-building measures in the Prepare and Prevent strands of CONTEST, the UK government's national strategy for countering terrorism, and explore the benefits and dangers of resilience according to how the concept is defined and applied across different contexts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Countering right-wing extremism: lessons from Germany and Norway

TL;DR: The growing threat of right-wing extremism creates challenges for countering violent extremism (CVE) strategies as discussed by the authors, and for countries like Australia with little historical background in countering RWE, such as Canada, New Zealand, and India.
Journal ArticleDOI

WWWMDs: Cyber-attacks against infrastructure in domestic anti-terror laws

TL;DR: It is argued that each of the four Commonwealth jurisdictions sets too low a threshold for prosecuting acts of cyber-terrorism against electronic and other infrastructure systems.
Posted Content

What is Terrorism? Assessing Domestic Legal Definitions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed three key criteria for assessing the appropriateness of definitions of terrorism in domestic legislation, including the principle of legality, which they used to evaluate the applicability of anti-terrorism powers in the UK, Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, India, and United States.