scispace - formally typeset
K

Kevin J. Ludwick

Researcher at LaGrange College

Publications -  20
Citations -  801

Kevin J. Ludwick is an academic researcher from LaGrange College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dark energy & Equation of state (cosmology). The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 19 publications receiving 742 citations. Previous affiliations of Kevin J. Ludwick include University of Virginia & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The little rip

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined models in which the dark energy density increases with time (so that the equation-of-state parameter $w$ satisfies $wl\ensuremath{-}1$), but $w\enuremath{\rightarrow}\ensure-math{1$ asymptotically, such that there is no future singularity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Models for little rip dark energy

TL;DR: In this paper, the conditions for the little-rip cosmology were derived in terms of the inertial force in the expanding universe and presented two representative models to illustrate the difference between little rip models and those which are asymptotically de Sitter.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pseudo-rip: Cosmological models intermediate between the cosmological constant and the little rip

TL;DR: In this paper, the cosmological constant and the big and little rips are compared to the pseudo-rip model, which is an intermediate case between cosmologically constant and little rip.
Journal ArticleDOI

The viability of phantom dark energy: A review

TL;DR: In this article, the theoretical consistency and viability of phantom dark energy as a field theory were examined and a brief review of the theoretical foundations for the theory was provided. But, since we expect every physical entity to have some kind of field description, we are not aware of any theoretical analysis of such a theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Viability of Phantom Dark Energy: A Brief Review

TL;DR: In this paper, the theoretical consistency and viability of phantom dark energy as a field theory were examined. But, since we expect every physical entity to have some kind of field description, we do not consider the case for a phantom field theory in this paper.