K
Kim E. Dooley
Researcher at Texas A&M University
Publications - 94
Citations - 1439
Kim E. Dooley is an academic researcher from Texas A&M University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Distance education & Agricultural education. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 92 publications receiving 1347 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Viewing Agricultural Education Research through a Qualitative Lens.
TL;DR: The authors used a heuristic approach through a content analysis of the literature to create a qualitative research conceptual framework to guide the agricultural education profession, which was used to guide agricultural educators to understand the history of qualitative research.
Journal Article
How the Perspectives of Administrators, Faculty, and Support Units Impact the Rate of Distance Education Adoption
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with using distance education (DE) technologies from the perspective of administrators, faculty, and support units within higher education.
Journal Article
A Content Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills as an Indicator of Quality of Online Discussion in Virtual Learning Communities
Leah E. Wickersham,Kim E. Dooley +1 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Perceived Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Impacting the Diffusion of Distance Education Technologies in a College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
TL;DR: In this article, the authors determine the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with using distance education (DE) technologies in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Texas A&M University from the perspective of administrators, faculty, and professional support staff.
Journal Article
Faculty Philosophical Position towards Distance Education: Competency, Value, and Educational Technology Support.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe faculty perceptions with respect to distance education competence, value, and information technology support by philosophical position towards distance education and find that teachers not philosophically opposed had a higher perceived value of distance education.