Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) changes the arterial structure and function, and is the most common manifestation of the atherosclerotic process, except for the coronary and cerebral arterial systems. Inflammation is well known to have a role in the progression of atherosclerosis and, by extension, in PAD. Among the recently studied markers in the literature, we list the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR). This study aims to analyze the preoperative role of NLR and PLR in the medium-term outcome of patients surgically revascularized for femoropopliteal disease. Methods: A retrospective study included patients admitted to the Vascular Surgery Clinic of the County Emergency Clinical Hospital of Târgu-Mureș, Romania, between January 2017 and December 2019, diagnosed with femoropopliteal disease and having presented an indication for surgical revascularization. The patients included in the study were classified according to the 12 months primary patency in two groups: “patency” and “nonpatency”. Results: Depending on the Rutherford classification (RC), there was a higher incidence of stages II and III in the patency group and a higher incidence of stage V in the nonpatency group. Depending on the optimal cut-off value according to ROC for the 12 months primary patency, obtained from Youden’s index (3.95 for NLR (82.6% sensitivity and 89.9% specificity), and 142.13 for PLR (79.1% sensitivity and 82.6% specificity)), in all high-NLR and high-PLR groups, there was a higher incidence of all adverse outcomes. Moreover, a multivariate analysis showed that a high baseline value for NLR and PLR was an independent predictor of all outcomes for all recruited patients. Furthermore, for all hospitalized patients, RC 5 was an independent predictor of poor prognosis. Conclusions: Our findings establish that a high value of preoperative NLR and PLR determined at hospital admission is strongly predictive of primary patency failure (12 months after revascularization). Additionally, elevated ratio values are an independent predictor for a higher amputation rate and death for all patients enrolled in the study, except for mortality in RC 2, and both amputation and mortality in RC 5.

/pdf/the-predictive-role-of-nlr-and-plr-in-outcome-and-patency-of-1aygb3by.pdf

The Predictive Role of NLR and PLR in Outcome and Patency of Lower Limb Revascularization in Patients with Femoropopliteal Disease

Acute Limb Ischemia (ALI) of the lower limb is defined as a sudden drop in arterial limb perfusion, which is a medical emergency requiring prompt intervention with high amputation and mortality rates in the absence of revascularization. This observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up aimed to confirm the relevance of the preoperative inflammatory biomarkers neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting the 30-day poor prognosis of patients with Rutherford classification (RC) grades II and III ALI. The ROC analysis found a strong association of an NLR > 4.33 with all studied outcomes, while a PLR > 143.34 was associated with all studied outcomes, except the composite endpoint in all RC stages. Depending on the optimal cut-off value, the ROC analysis found a higher incidence of all adverse outcomes in all high NLR (>4.33) and high PLR (>143.34) groups. A multivariate analysis showed that a high baseline value for NLR and PLR was an independent predictor of amputation (OR:11.09; 95% CI: 5.48–22.42; p < 0.0001; and OR:8.97; 95% CI: 4.44–18.16; p < 0.0001), mortality (OR:22.24; 95% CI: 9.61–51.47; p < 0.0001; and OR:8.32; 95% CI: 3.90–17.73; p < 0.0001), and composite endpoint (OR:21.93; 95% CI: 7.91–60.79; p < 0.0001; and OR:9.98; 95% CI: 3.89–25.55; p < 0.0001), respectively. Furthermore, for all hospitalized patients, the RC grade III (OR:7.33; 95% CI: 3.73–14.26; p < 0.0001) was an independent predictor of amputation (OR:7.33; 95% CI: 3.73–14.26; p < 0.0001), mortality (OR:8.40; 95% CI: 4.08–17.31; p < 0.0001), and composite endpoint (OR: 10.70; 95% CI: 4.48–25.56; p < 0.0001), respectively. The NLR and PLR are excellent predictors of risks associated with ALI for primary and secondary prevention. Our study showed that increased pre-operative values for NLR and PLR are indicators of a poor outcome in patients with RC grades II and III ALI.

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/6/822/pdf?version=1653997785

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Impact on Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Limb Ischemia

Simple Summary Growing evidence indicates that blood-count-based compound scores could be used as prognostic biomarkers in cancer as reflectors of uncontrolled inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Several markers have been developed in this regard, including the recent pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) that incorporates the levels of blood neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and lymphocytes. In this paper, we reviewed the association between PIV and overall survival or progression-free survival in cancer from the published studies to date. We observed that higher PIV levels were an adverse prognostic factor consistently across several clinical scenarios, including non-metastatic or metastatic disease and treatment with targeted therapy or immunotherapy. In contrast, the data were limited in patients treated with chemotherapy or patients with non-metastatic disease. The available evidence demonstrates that PIV could be a readily available biomarker for prognosis prediction in cancer. However, further research is needed to explore the promise of PIV as a prognostic biomarker in cancer. Abstract Background: Prognostic scores derived from the blood count have garnered significant interest as an indirect measure of the inflammatory pressure in cancer. The recently developed pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), an equation including the neutrophil, platelet, monocyte, and lymphocyte levels, has been evaluated in several cohorts, although with variations in the tumor types, disease stages, cut-offs, and treatments. Therefore, we evaluated the association between survival and PIV in cancer, performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review from the Pubmed, Medline, and Embase databases to filter the published studies until 17 May 2022. The meta-analyses were performed with the generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model. Results: Fifteen studies encompassing 4942 patients were included. In the pooled analysis of fifteen studies, the patients with higher PIV levels had significantly increased risk of death than those with lower PIV levels (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.51–2.64, p < 0.001) and increased risk of progression or death (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.39–2.32, p < 0.001). Analyses were consistent across several clinical scenarios, including non-metastatic or metastatic disease, different cut-offs (500, 400, and 300), and treatment with targeted therapy or immunotherapy (p < 0.001 for each). Conclusion: The available evidence demonstrates that PIV could be a prognostic biomarker in cancer. However, further research is needed to explore the promise of PIV as a prognostic biomarker in patients with non-metastatic disease or patients treated without immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

/pdf/the-association-between-the-pan-immune-inflammation-value-16owkxff.pdf

The Association between the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This cohort study investigates the optimal neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) threshold as a potential prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes among US patients with head and neck cancer.

/pdf/evaluation-of-optimal-threshold-of-neutrophil-lymphocyte-ujzffwwn.pdf

Evaluation of Optimal Threshold of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Its Association With Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract Circulating biomarkers have emerged as valuable surrogates for evaluating disease states in solid malignancies. Their relative ease of access and rapid turnover has bolstered clinical applications in monitoring treatment efficacy and cancer progression. In this review, the roles of various circulating biomarkers in monitoring treatment response are described. Non-specific markers of disease burden, tumor markers (eg CA 125, CEA, PSA, etc.), circulating tumor cells, nucleic acids, exosomes, and metabolomic arrays are highlighted. Specifically, the discovery of each of these markers is reviewed, with examples illustrating their use in influencing treatment decisions, and barriers to their application noted where these exist. Finally, opportunities for future work using these circulating biomarkers are discussed. 

OUP accepted manuscript

Inflammation plays a major role in cancer development and progression and has the potential to be used as a prognostic marker in cancer. Previous studies have attempted to evaluate Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) as indicators of inflammation/prognostic markers in cancer, but there is no common consensus on their application in clinical practice. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to (a) assess the prognostic efficacy of all three prognostic markers in comparison to each other and (b) investigate the prognostic potential of these three markers in HNC. The study followed PRISMA guidelines, with the literature being collated from multiple bibliographic databases. Preliminary and secondary screening were carried out using stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was carried out on selected studies using CMA software and HR as the pooled effect size metric. A total of 49 studies were included in the study. The pooled HR values of PLR, NLR and MLR indicated that they were significantly correlated with poorer OS. The pooled effect estimates for PLR, NLR and MLR were 1.461 (95% CI 1.329-1.674), 1.639 (95% CI 1.429-1.880) and 1.002 (95% CI 0.720-1.396), respectively. Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed in the meta-analysis of all three. The results of this study suggest that PLR, NLR and MLR ratios can be powerful prognostic markers in head and neck cancers that can guide treatment. Further evidence from large-scale clinical studies on patient cohorts are required before they can be incorporated as a part of the clinical method. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42019121008.

Prognostic Utility of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio in Head and Neck Cancers: A Detailed PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

/pdf/mapping-research-on-mirnas-in-cancer-a-global-data-analysis-2npytq9k.pdf

Krishnan Sunil

Papers

Prognostic Utility of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio in Head and Neck Cancers: A Detailed PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mapping Research on miRNAs in Cancer: A Global Data Analysis and Bibliometric Profiling Analysis