scispace - formally typeset
K

Kristen Renwick Monroe

Researcher at University of California, Irvine

Publications -  58
Citations -  2596

Kristen Renwick Monroe is an academic researcher from University of California, Irvine. The author has contributed to research in topics: Politics & Identity (social science). The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 57 publications receiving 2436 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Narrative in political science

TL;DR: This article defined narrative as a concept and as a methodological tool in social science, and provided intellectual background on how narrative developed in literary theory and how it has been applied in cognitive analysis, and discussed narratives as sites of cultural contestation and the role of narrative in the construction of social theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions

TL;DR: For instance, this paper conducted interviews with 80 female faculty at a large Research One university and found that both individual and institutional discrimination persists, and that women find legal mechanisms and direct political action of limited utility, and increasingly turn to more subtle forms of incremental collective action.
MonographDOI

The Heart of Altruism: Perceptions of a Common Humanity

TL;DR: The Human Face of Altruism as discussed by the authors is the human face of altruism, and it includes the entrepreneur, the philanthropist, the heroine and the rescuer of Jews in Nazi Europe.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Psychological Foundations of Identity Politics

TL;DR: A review of social psychological theories relating to political identity and group behavior can be found in this article, where the authors define individual and social identity, examine the main social psychological explanations of social identity and discuss work on intergroup relations, boundaries, and conflict.
Book

Perestroika! : the raucous rebellion in political science

TL;DR: The Perestroika movement became a major movement calling for change in the American political science community as mentioned in this paper, and it has been called a "revolt within the political science discipline".