L
Laszlo A. Erdodi
Researcher at University of Windsor
Publications - 98
Citations - 2281
Laszlo A. Erdodi is an academic researcher from University of Windsor. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Malingering. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 73 publications receiving 1512 citations. Previous affiliations of Laszlo A. Erdodi include Dartmouth College & London Health Sciences Centre.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators
Laszlo A. Erdodi,Christopher A. Abeare,Jonathan D. Lichtenstein,Bradley T. Tyson,Brittany Kucharski,Brandon G. Zuccato,Robert M. Roth +6 more
TL;DR: Processing speed based EVIs have the potential to provide a cost-effective and expedient method for evaluating the validity of cognitive data, however, they should not be used in isolation to determine the credibility of a given response set.
Journal ArticleDOI
Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators.
TL;DR: Embedded validity indicators are cost-effective psychometric tools to identify non-credible response sets during neuropsychological testing but the origin of this psychometric anomaly is explored, subject it to empirical investigation, and generate potential solutions.
Journal ArticleDOI
CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
Eben S. Schwartz,Laszlo A. Erdodi,Nicholas Rodriguez,Jyotsna J. Ghosh,Joshua R. Curtain,Laura A. Flashman,Robert M. Roth +6 more
TL;DR: In the absence of serious neurocognitive disorder, FCR ≤14 is highly specific, but only moderately sensitive to invalid responding, while passing FCR does not rule out a non-credible presentation, but failing FCR rules it in with high accuracy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: a comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs.
TL;DR: Although PVT failure rates varied as a function of PVTs and cutoffs, between a third and a fifth of the sample failed ≥1 PVTs, consistent with high initial estimates of invalid performance in this population.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparing the Recognition Memory Test and the Word Choice Test in a Mixed Clinical Sample: Are They Equivalent?
TL;DR: In this article, the Recognition Memory Test (RMT) was compared to the Word Choice Test (WCT) within the same fixed neuropsychological battery administered to a mixed clinical sample of 237 adults to empirically evaluate the psychometric equivalence of these two instruments.